Literature DB >> 28785193

Antegrade Ureteral Stenting is a Good Alternative for the Retrograde Approach.

Rutger W van der Meer1,2, Saskia Weltings3, Arian R van Erkel1, Hossain Roshani1, Henk W Elzevier4, Lukas C van Dijk2, Hans van Overhagen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Double J (JJ) stents for treating obstructive ureteral pathology are generally inserted through a retrograde route with cystoscopic guidance. Antegrade percutaneous insertion using fluoroscopy can be performed alternatively but is less known. Indications, success rate and complications of antegrade ureteral stenting were evaluated.
METHODS: Data of consecutive patients in which antegrade ureteral stenting was performed were retrospectively analysed using the radiology information system and patient records. Patient characteristics, details of the antegrade JJ stent insertion procedure and registered complications were collected. Furthermore, it was investigated if prior to the antegrade procedure a retrograde attempt for JJ stent insertion was performed.
RESULTS: Total 130 attempts for antegrade JJ stent insertion were performed in 100 patients. A percutaneous nephrostomy catheter had already been placed in the majority of kidneys (n = 109) for initial treatment of hydronephrosis. Most prevelant indication for a JJ stent was obstructive ureteral pathology due to malignancy (n = 63). A JJ stent was successfully inserted in 125 of 130 procedures. In 21 cases, previous retrograde ureteral stenting had failed but, subsequent antegrade ureteral stenting was successful. There were 8 procedure related complications; 6 infections, 1 false tract and 1 malposition.
CONCLUSION: Antegrade percutaneous insertion of a JJ stent is a good alternative for retrograde insertion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antegrade; Double J caheter; Drainage; Hydronephrosis; Kidney; Percutaneous; Ureteral obstruction; Ureteral stent

Year:  2017        PMID: 28785193      PMCID: PMC5527183          DOI: 10.1159/000447157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  14 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrostomy versus indwelling ureteral stent in the management of gynecological malignancies.

Authors:  Yan Song; Xiang Fei; Yongsheng Song
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  The management of ureteric obstruction secondary to malignant pelvic disease.

Authors:  S V Chitale; S Scott-Barrett; E T S Ho; N A Burgess
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 3.  Percutaneous nephrostomy with extensions of the technique: step by step.

Authors:  Raymond B Dyer; John D Regan; Peter V Kavanagh; Elaine G Khatod; Michael Y Chen; Ronald J Zagoria
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Percutaneous internal ureteral stent placement: review of technical issues and solutions in 50 consecutive cases.

Authors:  D S Lu; N Papanicolaou; M Girard; M J Lee; I C Yoder
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Antegrade internal ureteral stenting: a technical refinement.

Authors:  J C Hackethorn; S R Boren; C T Dotter; J Rösch
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Nephrostomy tube related pyelonephritis in patients with cancer: epidemiology, infection rate and risk factors.

Authors:  Ramez Bahu; Anne-Marie Chaftari; Ray Y Hachem; Kamran Ahrar; William Shomali; Aline El Zakhem; Ying Jiang; Munirah AlShuaibi; Issam I Raad
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Retrograde or antegrade double-pigtail stent placement for malignant ureteric obstruction?

Authors:  M C Uthappa; N C Cowan
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Predicting the success of retrograde stenting for managing ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  O Yossepowitch; D A Lifshitz; Y Dekel; M Gross; D M Keidar; M Neuman; P M Livne; J Baniel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  A review of antegrade stenting in the management of the obstructed kidney.

Authors:  S D Sharma; R A Persad; A Haq; D S Appleton; P T Doyle; K N Bullock; A Doble
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-10

Review 10.  Complications of ureteral stent placement.

Authors:  Raymond B Dyer; Michael Y Chen; Ronald J Zagoria; John D Regan; Charles G Hood; Peter V Kavanagh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

View more
  5 in total

1.  Antegrade double-J stent placement for the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ghassen Tlili; Houssem Ammar; Sonia Dziri; Khaled Ben Ahmed; Waad Farhat; Sofiene Arem; Emir Acacha; Rahul Gupta; Arib Rguez; Mehdi Jaidane
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-08-16

2.  Antegrade insertion of a double J catheter in the treatment of malignant ureteral obstruction: a retrospective analysis of the results obtained with a modified technique at a university hospital.

Authors:  Rômulo Florêncio Tristão Santos; Tiago Kojun Tibana; Edson Marchiori; Thiago Franchi Nunes
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2020 May-Jun

3.  Percutaneous insertion of bilateral double J in pelvic cancer patients: Indications, complications, technique of antegrade ureteral stenting.

Authors:  Túlio Fabiano de Oliveira Leite; Lucas Vatanabe Pazinato; Joaquim Mauricio da Motta Leal Filho
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-09-24

4.  Peritoneal perforation and peritonitis after antegrade double-J stent insertion: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Abdolreza Haghpanah; Faisal Ahmed; Seyed Hossein Hosseini; Ali Mashayekh; Anahita Dehghani; Sourena Rastin
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-10

5.  Intrathoracic ureteric stent migration through a reno-pleural fistula: a case report of rare antegrade ureteric stenting complication.

Authors:  Yi-Hsuan Chen; Marcelo Chen; Yu-Hsin Chen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.