Literature DB >> 8161191

Airborne environmental endotoxin: a cross-validation of sampling and analysis techniques.

M Walters1, D Milton, L Larsson, T Ford.   

Abstract

A standard method for measurement of airborne environmental endotoxin was developed and field tested in a fiberglass insulation-manufacturing facility. This method involved sampling with a capillary-pore membrane filter, extraction in buffer using a sonication bath, and analysis by the kinetic-Limulus assay with resistant-parallel-line estimation (KLARE). Cross-validation of the extraction and assay method was performed by comparison with methanolysis of samples followed by 3-hydroxy fatty acid (3-OHFA) analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Direct methanolysis of filter samples and methanolysis of buffer extracts of the filters yielded similar 3-OHFA content (P = 0.72); the average difference was 2.1%. Analysis of buffer extracts for endotoxin content by the KLARE method and by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for 3-OHFA content produced similar results (P = 0.23); the average difference was 0.88%. The source of endotoxin was gram-negative bacteria growing in recycled washwater used to clean the insulation-manufacturing equipment. The endotoxin and bacteria become airborne during spray cleaning operations. The types of 3-OHFAs in bacteria cultured from the washwater, present in the washwater and in the air, were similar. Virtually all of the bacteria cultured from air and water were gram negative composed mostly of two species, Deleya aesta and Acinetobacter johnsonii. Airborne countable bacteria correlated well with endotoxin (r2 = 0.64). Replicate sampling showed that results with the standard sampling, extraction, and Limulus assay by the KLARE method were highly reproducible (95% confidence interval for endotoxin measurement +/- 0.28 log10). These results demonstrate the accuracy, precision, and sensitivity of the standard procedure proposed for airborne environmental endotoxin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8161191      PMCID: PMC201423          DOI: 10.1128/aem.60.3.996-1005.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  29 in total

1.  Relationship between bacterial counts and endotoxin concentrations in the air of wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  S Laitinen; A Nevalainen; M Kotimaa; J Liesivuori; P J Martikainen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparative pyrogenic reactivity of rabbit and man to bacterial endotoxin.

Authors:  S E Greisman; R B Hornick
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1969-09

3.  Airborne micro-organisms and prevalence of byssinotic symptoms in cotton mills.

Authors:  F F Cinkotai; M G Lockwood; R Rylander
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1977-10

4.  Reactions during work shift among cotton mill workers.

Authors:  R Rylander; P Haglind; B T Butcher
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  A brief report of gram-negative bacterial endotoxin levels in airborne and settled dusts in animal confinement buildings.

Authors:  T D Thedell; J C Mull; S A Olenchock
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Endotoxins in cotton: washing effects and size distribution.

Authors:  S A Olenchock; J C Mull; W G Jones
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Humidifier fever and endotoxin exposure.

Authors:  R Rylander; P Haglind; M Lundholm; I Mattsby; K Stenqvist
Journal:  Clin Allergy       Date:  1978-09

8.  Detection of endotoxin in blood and other specimens by evaluation of photometrically registered LAL-reaction-kinetics in microtiter plates.

Authors:  B Ditter; K P Becker; R Urbaschek; B Urbaschek
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1982

9.  Relative potency of "environmental" endotoxin as measured by the Limulus amebocyte lysate test and the USP rabbit pyrogen test.

Authors:  F C Pearson; M E Weary; J Bohon; R Dabbah
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1982

10.  Conversion of lipopolysaccharides to molecular aggregates with reduced subunit heterogeneity: demonstration of LPS-responsiveness in "endotoxin-unresponsive" C3H/HeJ splenocytes.

Authors:  S W Vukajlovich; D C Morrison
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.422

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of endotoxin exposure assessment by bioaerosol impinger and filter-sampling methods.

Authors:  C Duchaine; P S Thorne; A Mériaux; Y Grimard; P Whitten; Y Cormier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Optimization of airborne endotoxin exposure assessment: effects of filter type, transport conditions, extraction solutions, and storage of samples and extracts.

Authors:  Suzanne Spaan; Dick J J Heederik; Peter S Thorne; Inge M Wouters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Use of gas chromatography-ion trap tandem mass spectrometry for the detection and characterization of microorganisms in complex samples.

Authors:  L Larsson; A Saraf
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Quantification of ergosterol and 3-hydroxy fatty acids in settled house dust by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: comparison with fungal culture and determination of endotoxin by a Limulus amebocyte lysate assay.

Authors:  A Saraf; L Larsson; H Burge; D Milton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Muramic acid, endotoxin, 3-hydroxy fatty acids, and ergosterol content explain monocyte and epithelial cell inflammatory responses to agricultural dusts.

Authors:  Jill A Poole; Gregory P Dooley; Rena Saito; Angela M Burrell; Kristina L Bailey; Debra J Romberger; John Mehaffy; Stephen J Reynolds
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2010

6.  Evaluation of lot-to-lot repeatability and effect of assay media choice in the recombinant Factor C assay.

Authors:  Jennifer Helen McKenzie; K Udeni Alwis; Joanne E Sordillo; Kesava Srinivas Kalluri; Donald Kirby Milton
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2011-05-09

7.  Influence of various dust sampling and extraction methods on the measurement of airborne endotoxin.

Authors:  J Douwes; P Versloot; A Hollander; D Heederik; G Doekes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effect of extraction and assay media on analysis of airborne endotoxin.

Authors:  Suzanne Spaan; Gert Doekes; Dick Heederik; Peter S Thorne; Inge M Wouters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.792

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.