STUDY OBJECTIVES: To measure emergency care providers' attitudes toward quality of life after spinal cord injury (SCI) and to determine if their perceptions influence the care they provide. DESIGN: A closed-ended questionnaire. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-three emergency nurses, emergency medicine technicians, emergency medicine residents, and attending physicians at three level I trauma centers were surveyed. Their responses were compared with previously reported quality-of-life ratings of a group of 128 high-level SCI survivors. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three emergency care providers completed the survey (response rate, 63%). Forty-one percent believed that resuscitation efforts after severe SCI are too aggressive, and 28% believed that future quality of life should be a factor in determining the interventions that should be provided. If they sustained severe SCIs themselves, 22% of providers would want nothing done to ensure their survival, and 23% would want pain relief only. Only 18% imagined they would be glad to be alive with a severe SCI, compared with 92% of a true SCI comparison group. Seventeen percent of providers anticipated an average or better quality of life compared with 86% of the actual SCI comparison group. CONCLUSION: The quality of life, self-esteem, and outcomes that emergency health care providers imaging after SCI are considerably more negative than those reported by SCI survivors. Because providers' knowledge and attitudes may affect the care they provide and may influence patients and families struggling with critical treatment decisions, emergency care providers must be aware of outcomes, well-being, and life satisfaction following severe SCI.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To measure emergency care providers' attitudes toward quality of life after spinal cord injury (SCI) and to determine if their perceptions influence the care they provide. DESIGN: A closed-ended questionnaire. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-three emergency nurses, emergency medicine technicians, emergency medicine residents, and attending physicians at three level I trauma centers were surveyed. Their responses were compared with previously reported quality-of-life ratings of a group of 128 high-level SCI survivors. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three emergency care providers completed the survey (response rate, 63%). Forty-one percent believed that resuscitation efforts after severe SCI are too aggressive, and 28% believed that future quality of life should be a factor in determining the interventions that should be provided. If they sustained severe SCIs themselves, 22% of providers would want nothing done to ensure their survival, and 23% would want pain relief only. Only 18% imagined they would be glad to be alive with a severe SCI, compared with 92% of a true SCI comparison group. Seventeen percent of providers anticipated an average or better quality of life compared with 86% of the actual SCI comparison group. CONCLUSION: The quality of life, self-esteem, and outcomes that emergency health care providers imaging after SCI are considerably more negative than those reported by SCI survivors. Because providers' knowledge and attitudes may affect the care they provide and may influence patients and families struggling with critical treatment decisions, emergency care providers must be aware of outcomes, well-being, and life satisfaction following severe SCI.
Authors: Charles H Bombardier; Casey B Azuero; Jesse R Fann; Donald D Kautz; J Scott Richards; Sunil Sabharwal Journal: Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil Date: 2021