Literature DB >> 8160745

Attitudes of physicians and genetics professionals toward cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

R R Faden1, E S Tambor, G A Chase, G Geller, K J Hofman, N A Holtzman.   

Abstract

With the identification of the cystic fibrosis (CF) gene and its major mutations in 1989, there has been considerable debate among health professionals as to whether population-based carrier testing should be instituted. This paper presents the results of a survey to determine the attitudes of physicians and genetics professionals toward CF carrier testing. Factors associated with differences in attitudes also were examined. A questionnaire was mailed to primary care physicians and psychiatrists in 10 states who graduated from medical school between 1950 and 1985. For comparison, medical geneticists and genetic counselors in the same states also received the questionnaire. A total of 1,140 primary care physicians and psychiatrists (64.8%) and 280 medical geneticists and genetic counselors (79.1%) responded. Although 92% of respondents believed that a couple should be tested after asking about a test that detected 80% of carriers, only 43.9% of respondents believed such a test should be offered routinely. Those specialists most likely to have been involved in genetic services were most opposed to routine screening. The most important reason reported for opposition to routine screening was the consequences of an 80% detection rate. When presented with a hypothetical "error-free" test, 75.9% of respondents favored routine testing. Our findings suggest that there was little support for routinely offering the CF carrier test available at the time of this study among the physicians and professionals most involved in the provision of genetic services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8160745     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320500102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  9 in total

1.  Carrier screening in preconception consultation in primary care.

Authors:  Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-12-20

2.  Attitudes of potential providers towards preconceptional cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Authors:  Francis A M Poppelaars; Herman J Adèr; Martina C Cornel; Lidewij Henneman; Rosella P M G Hermens; Gerrit van der Wal; Leo P ten Kate
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  The new genetics. Implications for clinical services in Britain and the United States.

Authors:  A L Kinmonth; J Reinhard; M Bobrow; S Pauker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-07

4.  Attitudes of health care professionals toward carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S Janssens; A De Paepe; P Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-12-29

5.  Update and Review: Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  T Brown; E L Schwind
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Evaluation of a project to enhance knowledge of hereditary diseases and management.

Authors:  I R Walpole; C Watson; D Moore; J Goldblatt; C Bower
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Lack of interest by nonpregnant couples in population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Authors:  E W Clayton; V L Hannig; J P Pfotenhauer; R A Parker; P W Campbell; J A Phillips
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Cystic fibrosis heterozygote screening in 5,161 pregnant women.

Authors:  D R Witt; C Schaefer; P Hallam; S Wi; B Blumberg; A Fishbach; J Holtzman; S Kornfeld; R Lee; L Nemzer; R Palmer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 9.  Preconception care: promoting reproductive planning.

Authors:  Sohni V Dean; Zohra S Lassi; Ayesha M Imam; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.