Literature DB >> 8160382

The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: effects of spatial scale and retinal eccentricity.

R F Hess1, A Hayes.   

Abstract

In this study we investigate the nature of the computations that underlie the encoding of spatial position by the human visual system. Specifically, we explore the relationship between alignment accuracy and retinal eccentricity for stimuli where local luminance, local contrast, and orientation cues do not underlie performance. Spatial scale is especially important for such a comparison because of the well documented spatial inhomogeneity of the human visual field. The results suggest that the relationship between spatial localization and eccentricity is invariant with spatial scale if accuracy and eccentricity are expressed in terms of the stimulus envelope size. We show that the photoreceptor disarray does not determine the limit to performance for this task, the limit is post-receptoral and can be modelled in terms of a positional uncertainty within the early filters located before the response envelope has been extracted. This uncertainty varies with eccentricity in a similar way within each spatial array.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8160382     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90018-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  Using the standard staircase to measure the point of subjective equality: a guide based on computer simulations.

Authors:  T S Meese
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-04

2.  Intrinsic position uncertainty explains detection and localization performance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Melchi Michel; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Psychometric functions of uncertain template matching observers.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Distance estimation is influenced by encoding conditions.

Authors:  Anna Oleksiak; Mirosława Mańko; Albert Postma; Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert V van den Berg; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visuospatial interpolation in typically developing children and in people with Williams Syndrome.

Authors:  Melanie Palomares; Barbara Landau; Howard Egeth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Factorial comparison of working memory models.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Edward Awh; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Bayesian integration of position and orientation cues in perception of biological and non-biological forms.

Authors:  Steven M Thurman; Hongjing Lu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  A bias in saccadic suppression of shape change.

Authors:  Carolin Hübner; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Spatial localisation in autism: evidence for differences in early cortical visual processing.

Authors:  Keziah Latham; Susana Tl Chung; Peter M Allen; Teresa Tavassoli; Simon Baron-Cohen
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 7.509

10.  Common cortical loci are activated during visuospatial interpolation and orientation discrimination judgements.

Authors:  Marc S Tibber; Elaine J Anderson; Dean R Melmoth; Geraint Rees; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.