Literature DB >> 8159681

Constraints of thermal noise on the effects of weak 60-Hz magnetic fields acting on biological magnetite.

R K Adair1.   

Abstract

Previous calculations of limits imposed by thermal noise on the effects of weak 60-Hz magnetic fields on biological magnetite are generalized and extended to consider multiple signals, the possibility of anomalously large magnetosome structures, and the possibility of anomalously small cytoplasm viscosities. The results indicate that the energies transmitted to the magnetite elements by fields less than 5 microT, characteristic of the electric power distribution system, will be much less than thermal noise energies. Hence, the effects of such weak fields will be masked by that noise and cannot be expected to affect biology or, therefore, the health of populations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8159681      PMCID: PMC43487          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.2925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

Review 1.  Discrimination of low-frequency magnetic fields by honeybees: biophysics and experimental tests.

Authors:  J L Kirschvink; T Kuwajima; S Ueno; S J Kirschvink; J Diaz-Ricci; A Morales; S Barwig; K J Quinn
Journal:  Soc Gen Physiol Ser       Date:  1992

2.  Magnetite biomineralization in the human brain.

Authors:  J L Kirschvink; A Kobayashi-Kirschvink; B J Woodford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The response of living cells to very weak electric fields: the thermal noise limit.

Authors:  J C Weaver; R D Astumian
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-01-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Comment on "Constraints on biological effects of weak extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields"

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 3.140

5.  Reply to "Comment on 'Constraints on biological effects of weak extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields' "

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 3.140

6.  Constraints on biological effects of weak extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1991-01-15       Impact factor: 3.140

7.  A nonselective cation channel activated by membrane deformation in oocytes of the ascidian Boltenia villosa.

Authors:  W J Moody; M M Bosma
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Viscosity of cellular protoplasm.

Authors:  A D Keith; W Snipes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Effects of ELF magnetic fields on biological magnetite.

Authors:  R K Adair
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.010

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  Shielding, but not zeroing of the ambient magnetic field reduces stress-induced analgesia in mice.

Authors:  E Choleris; C Del Seppia; A W Thomas; P Luschi; G Ghione; G R Moran; F S Prato
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields disrupt magnetic alignment of ruminants.

Authors:  Hynek Burda; Sabine Begall; Jaroslav Cervený; Julia Neef; Pavel Nemec
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Deep-etching electron microscopy of cells of Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum: evidence for filamentous structures connecting the magnetosome chain to the cell surface.

Authors:  Juliana Lopes Martins; Carolina Neumann Keim; Marcos Farina; Bechara Kachar; Ulysses Lins
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Information storing by biomagnetites.

Authors:  Istvan Bókkon; Vahid Salari
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 1.365

5.  Amplification of electromagnetic signals by ion channels.

Authors:  J Galvanovskis; J Sandblom
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Power lines, viruses, and childhood leukemia.

Authors:  J D Sahl
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Biological responses to weak 60-Hz electric and magnetic fields must vary as the square of the field strength.

Authors:  R K Adair
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  An evaluation of precaution-based approaches as EMF policy tools in community environments.

Authors:  J Sahl; M Dolan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Magnetoreception in laboratory mice: sensitivity to extremely low-frequency fields exceeds 33 nT at 30 Hz.

Authors:  Frank S Prato; Dawn Desjardins-Holmes; Lynn D Keenliside; Janice M DeMoor; John A Robertson; Alex W Thomas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.

Authors:  J McCann
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.