Literature DB >> 8159194

Imipramine in patients with chest pain despite normal coronary angiograms.

R O Cannon1, A A Quyyumi, R Mincemoyer, A M Stine, R H Gracely, W B Smith, M F Geraci, B C Black, T W Uhde, M A Waclawiw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ten to 30 percent of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization because of chest pain are found to have normal coronary angiograms. Because these patients may have a visceral pain syndrome unrelated to myocardial ischemia, we investigated whether drugs that are useful in chronic pain syndromes might also be beneficial in such patients.
METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients underwent cardiac, esophageal, psychiatric, and pain-sensitivity testing and then participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled three-week trial of clonidine at a dose of 0.1 mg twice daily (20 patients), imipramine at a dose of 50 mg nightly with a morning placebo (20 patients), or placebo twice daily (20 patients); this treatment phase was compared with an identical period of twice-daily placebo for all patients (placebo phase).
RESULTS: Thirteen (22 percent) of the 60 patients had ischemic-appearing electrocardiographic responses to exercise, 22 of the 54 tested (41 percent) had abnormal esophageal motility, 38 of 60 (63 percent) had one or more psychiatric disorders, and 52 of 60 (87 percent) had their characteristic chest pain provoked by right ventricular electrical stimulation or intracoronary infusion of adenosine. During the treatment phase, the imipramine group had a mean (+/- SD) reduction of 52 +/- 25 percent in episodes of chest pain, the clonidine group had a reduction of 39 +/- 51 percent, and the placebo group a reduction of 1 +/- 86 percent, all as compared with the placebo phase of the trial. Only the improvement with imipramine was statistically significant (P = 0.03). Repeat assessment of sensitivity to cardiac pain while the patients were receiving treatment showed significant improvement only in the imipramine group (P = 0.01). The response to imipramine did not depend on the results of cardiac, esophageal, or psychiatric testing at base line, or on the change in the psychiatric profile during the course of the study, which generally improved in all three study groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Imipramine improved the symptoms of patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms, possibly through a visceral analgesic effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8159194     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199405193302003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  92 in total

1.  Long-term outcome from tricyclic antidepressant treatment of functional chest pain.

Authors:  C Prakash; R E Clouse
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Functional heartburn: the stimulus, the pain, and the brain.

Authors:  R Fass; G Tougas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Noncardiac (Unexplained) Chest Pain.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-08

4.  Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-02

5.  Noncardiac Chest Pain of Esophageal Origin.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-12

6.  Management of esophageal chest pain.

Authors:  Sami R Achem
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-10

Review 7.  Emergence of Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Woman's Problem and Need for Change in Definition on Angiography.

Authors:  Carl J Pepine; Keith C Ferdinand; Leslee J Shaw; Kelly Ann Light-McGroary; Rashmee U Shah; Martha Gulati; Claire Duvernoy; Mary Norine Walsh; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Sex-specific factors in microvascular angina.

Authors:  Tara Sedlak; Mona Izadnegahdar; Karin H Humphries; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 9.  Cardiac Syndrome X: update 2014.

Authors:  Shilpa Agrawal; Puja K Mehta; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 10.  Syndrome X--angina and normal coronary angiography.

Authors:  A Chauhan
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.