OBJECTIVES: To develop a risk-assessment screening tool for very low birth weight (VLBW) and to compare our empirically derived tool to the nonempirically derived screening tool used by the State of Florida. METHODS: Birth records from the State of Florida Vital Statistics between 04/01/92 and 12/07/94 were matched with State Healthy Start prenatal records, reported from 04/01/92 through 03/31/94. Known and additional potentially important risk factors were identified from both sources. Generalized Linear Modeling techniques were used to estimate associations between risk factors and VLBW. A risk assessment system was then developed using the estimated model. The resulting screening test was compared with the one used by the Florida State Department of Health in terms of sensitivity and specificity on an independent validation sample. RESULTS: The proposed screening tool had comparable specificity to the Healthy Start screening tool but significantly better sensitivity. Both instruments are simple and easy to implement. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of women at high risk for VLBW would be improved using the model-based screening tool developed in this paper. Public health policy makers should use statistical methods in addition to expert opinion to improve existing risk assessment methods. The actual value of an improved screening instrument is dependent on the availability of effective intervention programs.
OBJECTIVES: To develop a risk-assessment screening tool for very low birth weight (VLBW) and to compare our empirically derived tool to the nonempirically derived screening tool used by the State of Florida. METHODS: Birth records from the State of Florida Vital Statistics between 04/01/92 and 12/07/94 were matched with State Healthy Start prenatal records, reported from 04/01/92 through 03/31/94. Known and additional potentially important risk factors were identified from both sources. Generalized Linear Modeling techniques were used to estimate associations between risk factors and VLBW. A risk assessment system was then developed using the estimated model. The resulting screening test was compared with the one used by the Florida State Department of Health in terms of sensitivity and specificity on an independent validation sample. RESULTS: The proposed screening tool had comparable specificity to the Healthy Start screening tool but significantly better sensitivity. Both instruments are simple and easy to implement. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of women at high risk for VLBW would be improved using the model-based screening tool developed in this paper. Public health policy makers should use statistical methods in addition to expert opinion to improve existing risk assessment methods. The actual value of an improved screening instrument is dependent on the availability of effective intervention programs.
Authors: Jay D Iams; Roger B Newman; Elizabeth A Thom; Robert L Goldenberg; Eberhard Mueller-Heubach; Atef Moawad; Baha M Sibai; Steve N Caritis; Menachem Miodovnik; Richard H Paul; Mitchell P Dombrowski; Gary Thurnau; Donald McNellis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-01-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lee Anne Roman; Cristian I Meghea; Jennifer E Raffo; H Lynette Biery; Shelby Berkowitz Chartkoff; Qi Zhu; Susan M Moran; Wm Thomas Summerfelt Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2008-12-16
Authors: Amber A Vos; Mieke J van Veen; Erwin Birnie; Semiha Denktaş; Eric A P Steegers; Gouke J Bonsel Journal: Int J Integr Care Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 5.120