Literature DB >> 8158265

Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4.

B C Motter1.   

Abstract

Neural activity in area V4 was examined to assess (1) whether the effects of attentive selection for stimulus features could be based on the memory of the feature, (2) whether dynamically changing the feature selection would cause activity associated with the newly selected stimuli to pop out, and (3) whether intrusion of more than one stimulus into the receptive field would disrupt the feature-selective activity. Rhesus monkeys were trained on several variations of a conditional orientation discrimination task. A differential activation of area V4 neurons was observed in the conditional discrimination task based on the presence of a match or a nonmatch between the conditional cue (a particular color or luminance) and the color or luminance of the receptive field stimulus. The differential activation was unchanged when the cue was removed and the animal had to remember its color (or luminance) to perform the task. When the cued feature was switched from one alternative to another in the middle of a trial the differential activation of neurons reversed over the course of 150-300 msec. If the stimulus in the receptive field contained the newly selected feature, V4 neurons became activated without a concomitant change in the stimulus in classical receptive field. Across the topographic map of V4 the activity associated with the newly selected stimuli popped out, whereas the activity of deselected stimuli faded to the background levels of other background objects. Evidence of a suppressive input from stimuli outside the classical receptive field was clear in only 3 of 24 neurons examined. Intrusion into the classical receptive field by a second stimulus resulted in a diminished difference between matching and nonmatching conditions. These physiological data suggest a major role for attentional control in the parallel processing of simple feature-selective differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8158265      PMCID: PMC6577149     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  56 in total

1.  A feedback model of attention and context dependence in visual cortical networks.

Authors:  K L Kirkland; G L Gerstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Task relevance enhances early transient and late slow-wave activity of distributed cortical sources.

Authors:  C J Aine; J M Stephen; R Christner; D Hudson; E Best
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

4.  The role of attention in visual processing.

Authors:  John H R Maunsell; Erik P Cook
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Correlates of transsaccadic integration in the primary visual cortex of the monkey.

Authors:  Paul S Khayat; Henk Spekreijse; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

8.  Imaging prior information in the brain.

Authors:  Scott Gorlin; Ming Meng; Jitendra Sharma; Hiroki Sugihara; Mriganka Sur; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Attention alters feature space in motion processing.

Authors:  Marc Zirnsak; Fred H Hamker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Perceptual grouping operates independently of attentional selection: evidence from hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Sarah Shomstein; Ruth Kimchi; Maxim Hammer; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.