Literature DB >> 8156519

p53 gene mutations and steroid receptor status in breast cancer. Clinicopathologic correlations and prognostic assessment.

M Caleffi1, M W Teague, R A Jensen, C L Vnencak-Jones, W D Dupont, F F Parl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence linking development and progression of cancer to an accumulation of mutations at the genomic level. The most frequently mutated gene known to date in sporadic breast cancer appears to be the tumor suppressor gene p53. This study was designed to determine the frequency of p53 gene mutations in primary breast cancer, to correlate the presence of p53 mutations with established clinicopathologic parameters, including the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status, and to assess the prognostic significance of p53 mutations regarding patient survival.
METHODS: We examined the p53 gene in genomic DNA samples from 192 primary breast cancers. Using denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis, the authors analyzed exons 5-9 in all tumors for mutations and performed DNA sequencing in 20 tumors to identify the exact nature of the p53 mutations.
RESULTS: p53 gene alterations were identified in 43 of the 192 tumors (22%), the majority localized in exons 5 and 6. DNA sequencing showed mostly missense mutations resulting from G or C substitutions. p53 mutations were found more often in tumors of younger women (P = 0.002), Afro-American women (P = 0.05), and in tumors lacking ER (P = 0.03), PR (P = 0.04), or both (P = 0.06). There were no significant correlations with family history, tumor size, histologic grade or type, nodal status, or disease stage. The overall survival rates showed no significant difference between patients with mutant and wild-type p53 tumors. The same was true when the comparison was limited to node-negative patients or patients with ER-positive or ER-negative tumors. Finally, there was no significant difference in survival between patients with tumors harboring mutations in exons 5 and 6 versus exons 7-9.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this and other studies demonstrate a consistent relationship between ER-positive tumors and wild-type p53 on one hand and ER-negative cancers and p53 mutations on the other. Our data do not support a significant prognostic role for p53 mutations in predicting survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8156519     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940415)73:8<2147::aid-cncr2820730820>3.0.co;2-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  25 in total

1.  Biological indices in the assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  A S Leong; A K Lee
Journal:  Clin Mol Pathol       Date:  1995-10

2.  The integration of a novice user interface into a professional modeling tool.

Authors:  S Ramakrishnan; C E Hmelo; R S Day; W E Shirey; Q Huang
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

3.  p53 mutation in breast cancer. Correlation with cell kinetics and cell of origin.

Authors:  T Megha; F Ferrari; A Benvenuto; C Bellan; A V Lalinga; S Lazzi; S Bartolommei; G Cevenini; L Leoncini; P Tosi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  SRC Increases MYC mRNA Expression in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer via mRNA Stabilization and Inhibition of p53 Function.

Authors:  Christopher Abdullah; Hasan Korkaya; Shinji Iizuka; Sara A Courtneidge
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  p53 gene mutations and expression of p53 and mdm2 proteins in invasive breast carcinoma. A comparative analysis with clinico-pathological factors.

Authors:  T Günther; R Schneider-Stock; J Rys; A Niezabitowski; A Roessner
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Emerging evidence for the role of differential tumor microenvironment in breast cancer racial disparity: a closer look at the surroundings.

Authors:  Sachin Kumar Deshmukh; Sanjeev K Srivastava; Nikhil Tyagi; Aamir Ahmad; Ajay P Singh; Ahmed A L Ghadhban; Donna L Dyess; James E Carter; Kari Dugger; Seema Singh
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Prognostic value of p53 in breast invasive ductal carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study on 942 cases.

Authors:  G MacGrogan; F Bonichon; I de Mascarel; M Trojani; M Durand; A Avril; J M Coindre
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Breast cancer and the immune system.

Authors:  Leanna J Standish; Erin S Sweet; Jeffrey Novack; Cynthia A Wenner; Carly Bridge; Ana Nelson; Mark Martzen; Carolyn Torkelson
Journal:  J Soc Integr Oncol       Date:  2008

9.  H19 overexpression in breast adenocarcinoma stromal cells is associated with tumor values and steroid receptor status but independent of p53 and Ki-67 expression.

Authors:  E Adriaenssens; L Dumont; S Lottin; D Bolle; A Leprêtre; A Delobelle; F Bouali; T Dugimont; J Coll; J J Curgy
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Oncogene protein co-expression. Value of Ha-ras, c-myc, c-fos, and p53 as prognostic discriminants for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  K I Bland; M M Konstadoulakis; M P Vezeridis; H J Wanebo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.