Literature DB >> 7794075

Oncogene protein co-expression. Value of Ha-ras, c-myc, c-fos, and p53 as prognostic discriminants for breast carcinoma.

K I Bland1, M M Konstadoulakis, M P Vezeridis, H J Wanebo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A refinement of prognostic variables using traditional pathologic markers integrated with oncogene proteins, enzymes, and hormonal factors may enhance the ability to predict for recurrence or survival in patients with mammary carcinoma. Although various oncogenes and oncogene products have been identified in human breast carcinoma, their relationship to disease outcome remains controversial.
METHODS: Using the monoclonal antibodies cS93.1, 9E1.0, F235-1.7.1, and PAb 1801 against each oncogene protein studied, the avidin-biotin complex immunoperoxidase method provided immunohistochemical staining of bound oncogene protein for c-fos, c-myc, Ha-ras, and p53, respectively. Analyses were made on archival pathology tissues of 85 breast cancer patients (stages I, IIA, and IIB). Forty patients (47%) had recurrence of disease; 45 remained free of local-regional or distant disease at mean follow-up of 48 months (range 6-180 months). Molecular biological data were merged with clinicopathologic demographics 1) to determine the frequency of single or co-expression of oncogenes in this patient population; 2) to evaluate the value of these molecular protein markers to predict probability of recurrence; and 3) to determine worth of the studied oncogenes to correlate with traditional clinical pathologic parameters and overall survival.
RESULTS: In this study, oncogene expression had statistical correlation for recurrence with increasing co-expression: one oncogene 17.2%, two oncogenes 56.3%, three or four oncogenes, 100% (p = 0.001). Increasing oncogene or co-oncogene expression correlated with statistically significant reduction in disease-free and overall survival; with no expression of oncogenes, disease-free survival was 30 (SE +/- 5.7) months and overall survival was 56.4 (SE +/- 4.57) months. With expression of three oncogenes, disease-free survival was 12 (SE +/- 1.23) months (p = 0.0018) and overall survival was 23.4 (SE +/- 3.38) months (p = 0.0025). In univariate Wilcoxon analysis, oncogene expression was the most significant variable to determine survival (p = 0.035); in multivariate analysis, age and oncogene co-expression each emerged as the most significant variables for overall survival. For the proportional hazards regression model, oncogene co-expression was significant (p = 0.0104, risk-ratio 1.914) and correlated with age and tumor size as significant variables. Ha-ras and c-fos both emerged as important individual oncogene proteins to affect survival (p = 0.0925, risk-ratio 3.517 and p = 0.025, risk-ratio 4.214, respectively). The proto-oncogene c-myc and the antitumor suppressor gene p53 did not have significant effects as individual oncogenes to influence survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one fifth of the breast cancer patients in this analysis (disease-free and recurrent) expressed only a single oncogene marker (c-fos, c-myc, Ha-ras, or p53); one quarter of patients with recurrent disease expressed only one oncogene protein. Single oncogene expression did not possess independent prognostic significance for prediction of recurrence. Further, p53 mutations did not function as independent correlates for prognosis. The co-expression of the studied proto-oncogenes (c-myc, Ha-ras) and the nuclear transcriptional protein (c-fos) functioned as a strong prognostic correlate for recurrence and survival; the effect of individual oncogenes to predict survival was greatest for Ha-ras and c-fos. Immediate or early co-expression of three oncogene proteins in neoplastic transformation endowed cells of invasive carcinoma with an aggressive phenotype. This aggressive phenotype was evident in a small percentage of the studied population (11%) and predicted adverse disease-free and overall survival. These findings suggest that oncogene co-expression possesses significant prognostic and potential therapeutic value; incorporation of this molecular technology into future prospective randomized trials is advisable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7794075      PMCID: PMC1234700          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199506000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  59 in total

1.  What would you do if this were your ... wife, sister, mother, self?

Authors:  D F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Oncogenes and tumor growth factors in breast cancer. A minireview.

Authors:  I T Ernberg
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  The use of flow cytometry for the prognosis of stage II adjuvant treated breast cancer patients.

Authors:  T E Kute; H B Muss; M R Cooper; L D Case; D Buss; V Stanley; B Gregory; J Galleshaw; K Booher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  p53 mutations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N R Rodrigues; A Rowan; M E Smith; I B Kerr; W F Bodmer; J V Gannon; D P Lane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The prognostic value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in female breast cancer. A single center study.

Authors:  O Mathiesen; O Bonderup; J Carl; J Panduro; K O Pedersen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  Cathepsin D and prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  A K Tandon; G M Clark; G C Chamness; J M Chirgwin; W L McGuire
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Precocious mammary gland development and milk protein synthesis in transgenic mice ubiquitously expressing human growth hormone.

Authors:  O Bchini; A C Andres; B Schubaur; M Mehtali; M LeMeur; R Lathe; P Gerlinger
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.736

8.  HER-2/neu amplification predicts poor survival in node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  A Borg; A K Tandon; H Sigurdsson; G M Clark; M Fernö; S A Fuqua; D Killander; W L McGuire
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Increased expression of mutant forms of p53 oncogene in primary lung cancer.

Authors:  R Iggo; K Gatter; J Bartek; D Lane; A L Harris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Abnormalities of the p53 tumour suppressor gene in human pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  C M Barton; S L Staddon; C M Hughes; P A Hall; C O'Sullivan; G Klöppel; B Theis; R C Russell; J Neoptolemos; R C Williamson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  26 in total

1.  Molecular markers (PECAM-1, ICAM-3, HLA-DR) determine prognosis in primary non-Hodgkin's gastric lymphoma patients.

Authors:  Alexander Darom; Ilias P Gomatos; Emmanuel Leandros; Emmu Chatzigianni; Dimitris Panousopoulos; Manousos M Konstadoulakis; George Androulakis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Molecular biomarkers for breast cancer prognosis: coexpression of c-erbB-2 and p53.

Authors:  S W Beenken; W E Grizzle; D R Crowe; M G Conner; H L Weiss; M T Sellers; H Krontiras; M M Urist; K I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  No significant correlation between oncogene protein expression and nodal status.

Authors:  M Noguchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Genetic alterations in patients with esophageal cancer with short- and long-term survival rates after curative esophagectomy.

Authors:  Y Shimada; M Imamura; I Shibagaki; H Tanaka; T Miyahara; M Kato; K Ishizaki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Molecular chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  A Patterson; A L Harris
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Correlation of reduction in MRP-1/CD9 and KAI1/CD82 expression with recurrences in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  C I Huang; N Kohno; E Ogawa; M Adachi; T Taki; M Miyake
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Stat5 activation inhibits prolactin-induced AP-1 activity: distinct prolactin-initiated signals in tumorigenesis dependent on cell context.

Authors:  J H Gutzman; D E Rugowski; S E Nikolai; L A Schuler
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Decreased expression of the DCC gene in human breast carcinoma.

Authors:  K Wakita; N Kohno; Y Sakoda; Y Ishikawa; M Sakaue
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Prognostic significance of loss of c-fos protein in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Seon Pil Jin; Ji Hun Kim; Min A Kim; Han-Kwang Yang; Hee Eun Lee; Hye Seung Lee; Woo Ho Kim
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2007-12-25       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Impact of c-MYC protein expression on outcome of patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer treated with adjuvant trastuzumab NCCTG (alliance) N9831.

Authors:  Amylou C Dueck; Monica M Reinholz; Xochiquetzal J Geiger; Kathleen Tenner; Karla Ballman; Robert B Jenkins; Darren Riehle; Beiyun Chen; Ann E McCullough; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; George W Sledge; Peter A Kaufman; Leila A Kutteh; Julie Gralow; Lyndsay N Harris; James N Ingle; Wilma L Lingle; Edith A Perez
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.