Literature DB >> 8152233

Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation.

D Greenwald1, S Shumway, P Albear, L Gottlieb.   

Abstract

The material properties of ten 2-O suture materials were evaluated tensiometrically at time = 0 and again after 6 weeks incubation in rats. All suture material was incubated and tested without knots. Specialized machinery was used with a custom securing apparatus to pull suture material apart at constant speed. Stress-strain curves were derived, and from these strength, toughness, strain at rupture, and elastic modulus were determined. Sutures tested included Vicryl [poly(glycolide-lactide)], Dexon (polyglycolic acid), Ethibond (polyester), silk, plain gut, chromic gut, Maxon (polyglyconate), PDS (polydioxanone), nylon, and Prolene (polypropylene). Elastic modulus was greatest for braided, least for monofilament, and intermediate for gut sutures, regardless of chemical composition (ANOVA, P = 0.0001). Strength, strain, and toughness decreased in all of the sutures over time in vivo with the exception of braided polyester (Ethibond), which remained stable. Silk demonstrated the least strength and toughness while PDS and Maxon were the strongest and toughest at time = 0. Vicryl, Dexon, and gut sutures were absorbed to the point that they could not be tested after 6 weeks in vivo. Performance tables are provided for all sutures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8152233     DOI: 10.1006/jsre.1994.1058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  33 in total

1.  Material properties of common suture materials in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  S Najibi; R Banglmeier; Jm Matta; M Tannast
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

2.  Fabrication of silk mesh with enhanced cytocompatibility: preliminary in vitro investigation toward cell-based therapy for hernia repair.

Authors:  O Guillaume; J Park; X Monforte; S Gruber-Blum; H Redl; A Petter-Puchner; A H Teuschl
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures.

Authors:  Jin-Cheol Kim; Yong-Keun Lee; Bum-Soon Lim; Sang-Hoon Rhee; Hyeong-Cheol Yang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Healing of subcutaneous tendons: Influence of the mechanical environment at the suture line on the healing process.

Authors:  Elsayed Ibraheem Elsayed Massoud
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

5.  Practice patterns in flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  C Healy; K J Mulhall; D J Bouchier-Hayes; B Kneafsey
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Development of silver nano-coatings on silk sutures as a novel approach against surgical infections.

Authors:  S De Simone; A L Gallo; F Paladini; A Sannino; M Pollini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Polyester Preserves the Highest Breaking Point After Prolonged Incubation in Pancreatic Juice.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Biagio Anselmi; Erica Secchettin; Fabrizio Boriero; Giuseppe Malleo; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  A Growth-Accommodating Implant for Paediatric Applications.

Authors:  Eric N Feins; Yuhan Lee; Eoin D O'Cearbhaill; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Shogo Shimada; Ingeborg Friehs; Douglas Perrin; Peter E Hammer; Haruo Yamauchi; Gerald Marx; Andrew Gosline; Veaceslav Arabagi; Jeffrey M Karp; Pedro J Del Nido
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 25.671

9.  Novel strategies in tendon and ligament tissue engineering: Advanced biomaterials and regeneration motifs.

Authors:  Catherine K Kuo; Joseph E Marturano; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2010-08-20

Review 10.  Biodegradation of silk biomaterials.

Authors:  Yang Cao; Bochu Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.