Literature DB >> 8151721

A comparison of breast self-examination and clinical examination.

T C Jacob1, N E Penn, J Giebink, R Bastien.   

Abstract

Twenty-six female college students were trained to examine their breasts using the Mammacare Method. After training, participants were asked to demonstrate their breast self-examination technique for a competency evaluation. On average, 85% of the components of the palpation technique were correctly included in the participants' self-examinations, indicating that they had been trained competently. Breast self-examiners then were asked to palpate three breast models in search of embedded lumps. Thirteen health professionals were asked to examine the same breast models for lumps. The examination of the models by self-examiners was compared to that by health professionals. Breast self-examiners took longer to examine each model, and on average correctly identified significantly more lumps than health professionals. The two groups did not differ in number of false-positive findings. These results indicate that women adequately trained to perform breast self-examination can perform breast examinations at least as accurately as health professionals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8151721      PMCID: PMC2607651     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  17 in total

1.  Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Breast self-examination--a practice whose time has come?

Authors:  J Feldman
Journal:  N Y State J Med       Date:  1985-08

3.  Physicians' abilities to detect lumps in silicone breast models.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; M S O'Malley; L A Bunce
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The value of breast self-examination.

Authors:  C M Huguley; R L Brown
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Predictors of proficient technique and successful lesion detection in breast self-examination.

Authors:  S W Alagna; D M Reddy
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Relationship between breast self-examination and death from breast cancer by age groups.

Authors:  M C Costanza; R S Foster
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1984

7.  Breast self-examination practices and breast-cancer stage.

Authors:  R S Foster; S P Lang; M C Costanza; J K Worden; C R Haines; J W Yates
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Estimated effect of breast self-examination and routine physician examinations on breast-cancer mortality.

Authors:  P Greenwald; P C Nasca; C E Lawrence; J Horton; R P McGarrah; T Gabriele; K Carlton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Breast self-examination: clinical results from a population-based prospective study.

Authors:  J Philip; W G Harris; C Flaherty; C A Joslin; J H Rustage; D P Wijesinghe
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.