Literature DB >> 8150462

Diagnostic criteria and histologic grading in multiple myeloma: histologic and immunohistologic analysis of 176 cases with clinical correlation.

S Sukpanichnant1, J B Cousar, A Leelasiri, S E Graber, J P Greer, R D Collins.   

Abstract

Diagnostic criteria in myeloma have not been completely standardized or tested for accuracy; furthermore, marrow findings of prognostic value have not been clearly identified. We studied 176 patients with myeloma to determine the relative value of marrow differential, tissue sections, and immunohistology singly or in concert in the diagnosis of myeloma and to correlate morphologic features with prognosis. Controls were patients with benign marrow plasmacytosis. Homogeneous nodules of plasma cells at least 1/2 high-power field and/or monotypic aggregates of plasma cells filling at least one interfatty marrow space correctly identified myeloma in 83.5% of cases, with no false positives. The current numerical criteria of marrow plasmacytosis > or = 10% occurred in 17.1% of the controls, and 39.7% of patients with myeloma had less than 10% marrow plasmacytosis at presentation. Myeloma was graded histologically into categories of none/minimal, moderate, and marked dysplasia on the basis of dysplastic features and mitoses; these categories correlated well with clinical outcome, with median length of survival of 32.9, 25.2, and 12.9 months, respectively (overall median length of survival of 123 patients with myeloma, 29.2 months). Packing of marrow by tumor and mitoses measuring at least 5/high-power field regardless of grade also was associated with a poor prognosis (median lengths of survival, 15.2 and 11 months, respectively). Myeloma may be diagnosed in the great majority of cases by demonstrating homogeneous nodules and/or monotypic aggregates of plasma cells in the marrow. Prognostic features were shown to include marked dysplasia, mitoses, packing of marrow by tumor, and clinical stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8150462     DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(94)90204-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  12 in total

Review 1.  Bone marrow immunohistology of plasma cell neoplasms.

Authors:  A Wei; S Juneja
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Assessment of bone marrow plasma cell infiltrates in multiple myeloma: the added value of CD138 immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Samer Z Al-Quran; Lijun Yang; James M Magill; Raul C Braylan; Vonda K Douglas-Nikitin
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  The value of FDG PET/CT in the initial staging and bone marrow involvement of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sait Sager; Nurhan Ergül; Hediye Ciftci; Güven Cetin; Sebnem Izmir Güner; Teyfik Fikret Cermik
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Variant morphology in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Prasad R Koduri; Swarnalata Gowrishankar; Vijay Kumar Malladi
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 5.  What we mean when we talk about MRD in myeloma. A review of current methods. Part 1 of a two-part series.

Authors:  Scott Ely; Noa Biran; Ajai Chari
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  CT features of abdominal plasma cell neoplasms.

Authors:  J Monill; J Pernas; E Montserrat; C Pérez; J Clavero; A Martinez-Noguera; R Guerrero; S Torrubia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sanja Stifter; Emina Babarović; Toni Valković; Irena Seili-Bekafigo; Christophe Stemberger; Antica Nacinović; Ksenija Lucin; Nives Jonjić
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  Multiparameter flow cytometry quantification of bone marrow plasma cells at diagnosis provides more prognostic information than morphological assessment in myeloma patients.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Maria-Belén Vidriales; Jose J Pérez; Gema Mateo; Maria Angeles Montalbán; Maria Victoria Mateos; Joan Bladé; Juan José Lahuerta; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Immunohistochemical evaluation of 95 bone marrow reactive plasmacytoses.

Authors:  Maria G Ioannou; Efstathios Stathakis; Andreas C Lazaris; Thomas Papathomas; Evangelos Tsiambas; George K Koukoulis
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  G Grignani; P G Gobbi; R Formisano; C Pieresca; G Ucci; S Brugnatelli; A Riccardi; E Ascari
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.