Literature DB >> 8624271

A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.

G Grignani1, P G Gobbi, R Formisano, C Pieresca, G Ucci, S Brugnatelli, A Riccardi, E Ascari.   

Abstract

The current prognostic systems have failed to identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients who require aggressive therapy. These staging systems do not reliably distinguish patients with different prognoses. This paper explores the possibility of improving the prognostic forecast in MM by considering some clinical characteristics at diagnosis together with response to first-line chemotherapy. A total of 231 patients were prospectively randomised in a multicentre trial to no therapy vs melphalan + prednisone (MP) for stage I, MP in stage II, and MP vs peptichemio, vincristine and prednisone for stage III. The clinical features of these groups were evaluated for prognostic variables predictive of overall survival by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. The independently significant variables were incorporated into a model that identified three groups of patients with different risks of death and different overall survival. Three variables retained statistical significance: the staging system proposed by the British Medical Research Council, a composite parameter integrating the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells with cytological features of the infiltrating elements (plasma cell vs plasmablast), and response to 6 months of first-line chemotherapy. These three variables led the proposal of a scoring system able to identify three different risk classes (with median overall survival of 52, 28 and 13 months respectively) and to estimate individual patient prognosis more flexibly. The proposed risk classes, drawn from both diagnostic and therapeutic parameters, are thought to be a clinical and investigational instrument for separating MM patients into comparable groups, for selecting the best available therapy and for evaluating response with respect to the disease of each new patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8624271      PMCID: PMC2074407          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  45 in total

1.  Development of a criterion for response to therapy at 6 months in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  F Guillemin; A P Guerci; P Feugier; P Péré; J Pourel; O Guerci
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Pre-B cells in peripheral blood of multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  L M Pilarski; M J Mant; B A Ruether
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  The growth fraction of human myeloma cells.

Authors:  B Drewinko; R Alexanian; H Boyer; B Barlogie; S I Rubinow
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Prognostic relevance of cellular morphology in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  E Fritz; H Ludwig; M Kundi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  A new improved clinical staging system for multiple myeloma based on analysis of 123 treated patients.

Authors:  G Merlini; J G Waldenström; S D Jayakar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Identification of malignant plasma cell precursors in the bone marrow of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  F Caligaris-Cappio; L Bergui; L Tesio; G Pizzolo; F Malavasi; M Chilosi; D Campana; B van Camp; G Janossy
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Bone marrow histology in myeloma: its importance in diagnosis, prognosis, classification and staging.

Authors:  R Bartl; B Frisch; R Burkhardt; A Fateh-Moghadam; G Mahl; P Gierster; M Sund; G Kettner
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 6.998

8.  A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate.

Authors:  J H Goldie; A J Coldman
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1979 Nov-Dec

9.  A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival.

Authors:  B G Durie; S E Salmon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Multiple myeloma: significance of plasmablastic subtype in morphological classification.

Authors:  P R Greipp; N M Raymond; R A Kyle; W M O'Fallon
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  15 in total

1.  Multiple myeloma: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 2.  Smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Ola Landgren; María-Victoria Mateos
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Unfolded protein response inducers tunicamycin and dithiothreitol promote myeloma cell differentiation mediated by XBP-1.

Authors:  Hua Jiang; Jianfeng Zou; Hui Zhang; Weijun Fu; Tianmei Zeng; Hejing Huang; Fan Zhou; Jian Hou
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Blockade of Deubiquitylating Enzyme USP1 Inhibits DNA Repair and Triggers Apoptosis in Multiple Myeloma Cells.

Authors:  Deepika Sharma Das; Abhishek Das; Arghya Ray; Yan Song; Mehmet Kemal Samur; Nikhil C Munshi; Dharminder Chauhan; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: current diagnostic criteria, new predictors of outcome, and follow-up recommendations.

Authors:  Joan Bladé; Meletios Dimopoulos; Laura Rosiñol; S Vincent Rajkumar; Robert A Kyle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Smoldering multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Joan Bladé; Laura Rosiñol
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-05

7.  Lenalidomide in multiple myeloma: an evidence-based review of its role in therapy.

Authors:  Paul Richardson; Constantine Mitsiades; Jacob Laubach; Robert Schlossman; Irene Ghobrial; Teru Hideshima; Nikhil Munshi; Kenneth Anderson
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2010-06-15

Review 8.  Multiple myeloma: 2016 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 9.  Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji Kumar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 10.  New approaches to smoldering myeloma.

Authors:  María-Victoria Mateos; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.