Literature DB >> 8150287

The effects of insertions on mammalian intrachromosomal recombination.

A R Godwin1, R M Liskay.   

Abstract

We examined the effects of insertion mutations on intrachromosomal recombination. A series of mouse L cell lines carrying mutant herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (tk) heteroalleles was generated; these lines differed in the nature of their insertion mutations. In direct repeat lines with different large insertions in each gene, there was a 20-fold drop in gene conversion rate and only a five-fold drop in crossover rate relative to the analogous rates in lines with small insertions in each gene. Surprisingly, in direct repeat lines carrying the same large insertion in each gene, there was a larger drop in both types of recombination. When intrachromosomal recombination between inverted repeat tk genes with different large insertions was examined, we found that the rate of gene conversion dropped five-fold relative to small insertions, while the rate of crossing over was unaffected. The differential effects on conversion and crossing over imply that gene conversion is more sensitive to insertion mutation size. Finally, the fraction of gene conversions associated with a crossover increased from 2% for inverted repeats with small insertions to 18% for inverted repeats with large insertions. One interpretation of this finding is that during intrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells long conversion tracts are more often associated with crossing over.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8150287      PMCID: PMC1205812     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  28 in total

1.  Yeast intrachromosomal recombination: long gene conversion tracts are preferentially associated with reciprocal exchange and require the RAD1 and RAD3 gene products.

Authors:  A Aguilera; H L Klein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A central role for chromosome breakage in gene amplification, deletion formation, and amplicon integration.

Authors:  B Windle; B W Draper; Y X Yin; S O'Gorman; G M Wahl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Formation of an inverted duplication can be an initial step in gene amplification.

Authors:  J C Ruiz; G M Wahl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Conservative intrachromosomal recombination between inverted repeats in mouse cells: association between reciprocal exchange and gene conversion.

Authors:  R J Bollag; R M Liskay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection of DNA into cultured mammalian cells.

Authors:  M R Capecchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Dicentric chromosome 13 and centromere inactivation.

Authors:  S Schwartz; C G Palmer; D D Weaver; J Priest
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  HPR1, a novel yeast gene that prevents intrachromosomal excision recombination, shows carboxy-terminal homology to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TOP1 gene.

Authors:  A Aguilera; H L Klein
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Mitotic and meiotic gene conversion of Ty elements and other insertions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Vincent; T D Petes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inactive X chromosome DNA does not function in DNA-mediated cell transformation for the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene.

Authors:  R M Liskay; R J Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Gene conversion between duplicated genetic elements in yeast.

Authors:  J A Jackson; G R Fink
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-07-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  14 in total

1.  Long inverted repeats are an at-risk motif for recombination in mammalian cells.

Authors:  A S Waldman; H Tran; E C Goldsmith; M A Resnick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Coupled homologous and nonhomologous repair of a double-strand break preserves genomic integrity in mammalian cells.

Authors:  C Richardson; M Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Interchromosomal gene conversion at an endogenous human cell locus.

Authors:  P J Quintana; E A Neuwirth; A J Grosovsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Incorporation of large heterologies into heteroduplex DNA during double-strand-break repair in mouse cells.

Authors:  Steven J Raynard; Mark D Baker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Mechanisms of double-strand-break repair during gene targeting in mammalian cells.

Authors:  P Ng; M D Baker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Stability of an inverted repeat in a human fibrosarcoma cell.

Authors:  P R Kramer; J R Stringer; R R Sinden
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Double-strand break repair by interchromosomal recombination: suppression of chromosomal translocations.

Authors:  C Richardson; M E Moynahan; M Jasin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Analysis of recombination sites within the maize waxy locus.

Authors:  R J Okagaki; C F Weil
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Spontaneous and restriction enzyme-induced chromosomal recombination in mammalian cells.

Authors:  A R Godwin; R J Bollag; D M Christie; R M Liskay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Spontaneous mitotic homologous recombination at an enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) cDNA direct repeat in transgenic mice.

Authors:  Carrie A Hendricks; Karen H Almeida; Molly S Stitt; Vidya S Jonnalagadda; Rebecca E Rugo; G Foster Kerrison; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.