Literature DB >> 8149718

The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: word recognition in English and German children.

H Wimmer1, U Goswami.   

Abstract

Groups of 7, 8, and 9-year-old children who were learning to read in English and German were given three different continuous reading tasks: a numeral reading task, a number word reading task, and a nonsense word reading task. The nonsense words could be read by analogy to the number words. Whereas reading time and error rates in numeral and number word reading were very similar across the two orthographies, the German children showed a big advantage in reading the nonsense words. This pattern of results is interpreted as evidence for the initial adoption of different strategies for word recognition in the two orthographies. German children appear to rely on assembling pronunciations via grapheme-phoneme conversion, and English children appear to rely more on some kind of direct recognition strategy. A model of reading development that takes account of orthographic consistency is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8149718     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90010-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  22 in total

1.  Shallow and deep orthographies in Hebrew: the role of vowelization in reading development for unvowelized scripts.

Authors:  Rachel Schiff
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-12

2.  Processing multi-digit numbers: a translingual eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Julia Bahnmueller; Stefan Huber; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Silke M Göbel; Korbinian Moeller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 3.  Reading and spelling disorders: clinical features and causes.

Authors:  A Warnke
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  The initial capitalization superiority effect in German: evidence for a perceptual frequency variant of the orthographic cue hypothesis of visual word recognition.

Authors:  Arthur M Jacobs; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Ralf Graf; Mario Braun; Tatjana A Nazir
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

Review 5.  Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth.

Authors:  Xenia Schmalz; Eva Marinus; Max Coltheart; Anne Castles
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

6.  Developmental differences for word processing in the ventral stream.

Authors:  Olumide A Olulade; D Lynn Flowers; Eileen M Napoliello; Guinevere F Eden
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Initial validation of a measure of decoding difficulty as a unique predictor of miscues and passage reading fluency.

Authors:  Neena M Saha; Laurie Cutting; Stephanie Del Tufo; Stephen Bailey
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2020-08-06

Review 8.  Early literacy experiences constrain L1 and L2 reading procedures.

Authors:  Adeetee Bhide
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-02

9.  Non-word reading, lexical retrieval and stuttering: comments on Packman, Onslow, Coombes and Goodwin (2001).

Authors:  James Au-Yeung; Peter Howell
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.346

10.  Improving word reading speed: individual differences interact with a training focus on successes or failures.

Authors:  Esther G Steenbeek-Planting; Wim H J van Bon; Robert Schreuder
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2011-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.