Literature DB >> 8149143

Cancer patients and their network: the meaning of the social network and social interactions for quality of life.

J H de Ruiter1, J C de Haes, R Tempelaar.   

Abstract

A lot of research is carried out on the subject of social relations and quality of life. One should find at least some indication for an association between the social environment and quality of life of cancer patients; will interventions be appropriate and well-considered? But until now, less has been known about the association between the social network of cancer patients and their quality of life. In this study, the way in which the patients' network can effect their quality of life is examined. Two patient groups are distinguished: a group of cancer patients recently treated for their cancer by surgery and a group treated by chemotherapy (n = 108 and n = 109) and these are compared with a disease-free group of cancer patients (n = 192). Although an association between network, social relations and quality of life is found, only a small part of the variation in quality of life can be explained by this social component. It seems that the cancer itself and the cancer treatment mainly affect the patients' quality of life and that the impact of the social environment is less significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8149143     DOI: 10.1007/bf00366062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  10 in total

1.  The distinction between affect and cognition in the quality of life of cancer patients--sensitivity and stability.

Authors:  J C de Haes; J H de Ruiter; R Tempelaar; B J Pennink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Victims' perceptions of social support: what is helpful from whom?

Authors:  G A Dakof; S E Taylor
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-01

3.  Medical professional support and cardiac rehabilitation of males and females.

Authors:  H R Winefield; M Katsikitis
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Social support, support groups, and the cancer patient.

Authors:  S E Taylor; R L Falke; S J Shoptaw; R R Lichtman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1986-10

Review 5.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Authors:  S Cohen; T A Wills
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress.

Authors:  P A Thoits
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1982-06

Review 7.  The quality of life of cancer patients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J C de Haes; F C van Knippenberg
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Social support and recovery after surgery for breast cancer: frequency and correlates of supportive behaviours by family, friends and surgeon.

Authors:  S J Neuling; H R Winefield
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Social support and the cancer patient. Conceptual and methodologic issues.

Authors:  C B Wortman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The social experiences of cancer patients under treatment: a comparative study.

Authors:  R Tempelaar; J C De Haes; J H De Ruiter; D Bakker; W J Van Den Heuvel; M G Van Nieuwenhuijzen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Couples coping with cancer: Research issues and recent findings.

Authors:  S Manne
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  1994-12

2.  Supportive and negative responses in the partner relationship: their association with psychological adjustment among individuals with cancer.

Authors:  S L Manne; K L Taylor; J Dougherty; N Kemeny
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1997-04

3.  The evaluation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale: Depressed and Positive Affect in cancer patients and healthy reference subjects.

Authors:  M J Schroevers; R Sanderman; E van Sonderen; A V Ranchor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The course and predictors of perceived unsupportive responses by family and friends among women newly diagnosed with gynecological cancers.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Deborah A Kashy; David W Kissane; Melissa Ozga; Shannon Myers Virtue; Carolyn J Heckman
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.046

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.