Literature DB >> 8146233

Spatial and temporal response properties of residual vision in a case of hemianopia.

J L Barbur1, A J Harlow, L Weiskrantz.   

Abstract

Residual vision in subjects with damage of the primary visual cortex (striate cortex) has been demonstrated in many previous studies and is taken to reflect the properties of known subcortical and extrastriate visual pathways. In this report we describe psychophysical experiments carried out on a subject clinically blind in half of his visual field (i.e. homonymous hemianopia) caused by striate cortex damage. They reveal the existence of two distinct channels mediating such vision. One channel responds to spatial structure and the other to light flux changes. The spatially tuned channel has a peak response at about 1.2 cycles per degree and shows rapid loss of sensitivity at both high and low spatial frequencies. This channel does not respond to diffuse illumination. The light flux channel, however, responds only to sudden increments in light flux levels on the retina and shows extensive spatial summation. Both channels require transient inputs, with a peak sensitivity at about 10 cycles per second and show virtually complete attenuation at temporal frequencies below 2 cycles per second. The spatiotemporal characteristics of these two channels account for much of the reported limits of visual performance attributed to subcortical or extrastriate pathways in some patients, and especially for their relatively good sensitivity for the detection of abrupt, transient stimuli or fast-moving targets. A new method is also applied to the measurement of the amount of light scatter in the eye. The measurements show that light scatter into the sighted hemifield could not account for the results obtained with the stimuli used to characterized the residual vision of this subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8146233     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  14 in total

1.  Illusory motion perception in blindsight.

Authors:  Paul Azzopardi; Howard S Hock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Improved detection following Neuro-Eye Therapy in patients with post-geniculate brain damage.

Authors:  Arash Sahraie; Mary-Joan Macleod; Ceri T Trevethan; Siân E Robson; John A Olson; Paula Callaghan; Brigitte Yip
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Parameters affecting conscious versus unconscious visual discrimination with damage to the visual cortex (V1).

Authors:  L Weiskrantz; J L Barbur; A Sahraie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Movement in the normal visual hemifield induces a percept in the 'blind' hemifield of a human hemianope.

Authors:  A L Finlay; S R Jones; A B Morland; J A Ogilvie; K H Ruddock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Pupil response triggered by the onset of coherent motion.

Authors:  A Sahraie; J L Barbur
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Beyond blindsight: properties of visual relearning in cortically blind fields.

Authors:  Anasuya Das; Duje Tadin; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Increased sensitivity after repeated stimulation of residual spatial channels in blindsight.

Authors:  Arash Sahraie; Ceri T Trevethan; Mary Joan MacLeod; Alison D Murray; John A Olson; Lawrence Weiskrantz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Disorders of higher cortical visual function.

Authors:  James Goodwin
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 9.  Relearning to See in Cortical Blindness.

Authors:  Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.519

10.  Pupil response as a predictor of blindsight in hemianopia.

Authors:  Arash Sahraie; Ceri T Trevethan; Mary Joan MacLeod; James Urquhart; Lawrence Weiskrantz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.