Literature DB >> 27028127

Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a laboratory study.

Caroline Praz1,2, Benedikt Fasel3, Philippe Vuistiner2,4, Kamiar Aminian5, Bengt Kayser6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the energy cost of linear (EC) and vertical displacement (ECvert), mechanical efficiency and main stride parameters during simulated ski mountaineering at different speeds and gradients, to identify an optimal speed and gradient that maximizes performance.
METHODS: 12 subjects roller skied on a treadmill at three different inclines (10, 17 and 24 %) at three different speeds (approximately 70, 80 and 85 % of estimated peak heart rate). Energy expenditure was calculated by indirect calorimetry, while biomechanical parameters were measured with an inertial sensor-based system.
RESULTS: At 10 % there was no significant change with speed in EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency. At 17 and 24 % the fastest speed was significantly more economical. There was a significant effect of gradient on EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency. The most economical gradient was the steepest one. There was a significant increase of stride frequency with speed. At steep gradients only, relative thrust phase duration decreased significantly, while stride length increased significantly with speed. There was a significant effect of gradient on stride length (decrease with steepness) and relative thrust phase duration (increase with steepness).
CONCLUSION: A combination of a decreased relative thrust phase duration with increased stride length and frequency decreases ECvert. To minimize the energy expenditure to reach the top of a mountain and to optimize performance, ski-mountaineers should choose a steep gradient (~24 %) and, provided they possess sufficient metabolic scope, combine it with a fast speed (~6 km h(-1)).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Endurance; Energy expenditure; Skiing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27028127     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3371-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  29 in total

1.  Energy cost of running.

Authors:  R MARGARIA; P CERRETELLI; P AGHEMO; G SASSI
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Physiology of ski mountaineering racing.

Authors:  S Duc; J Cassirame; F Durand
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Energy cost and efficiency of ski mountaineering. A laboratory study.

Authors:  P Tosi; A Leonardi; L Zerbini; A Rosponi; F Schena
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Biomechanical and energetic determinants of technique selection in classical cross-country skiing.

Authors:  Barbara Pellegrini; Chiara Zoppirolli; Lorenzo Bortolan; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Paola Zamparo; Federico Schena
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Energetically optimal stride frequency in running: the effects of incline and decline.

Authors:  Kristine L Snyder; Claire T Farley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Energy expenditure of extreme competitive mountaineering skiing.

Authors:  Caroline Praz; Bertrand Léger; Bengt Kayser
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Positive and negative work performances and their efficiencies in human locomotion.

Authors:  R Margaria
Journal:  Int Z Angew Physiol       Date:  1968-05-28

8.  Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man.

Authors:  A E Minetti; L P Ardigò; F Saibene
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Optimum gradient of mountain paths.

Authors:  A E Minetti
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1995-11

Review 10.  Age dependency of oxygen uptake and related parameters in exercise testing: an expert opinion on reference values suitable for adults.

Authors:  Joachim Schneider
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.584

View more
  7 in total

1.  Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a field study.

Authors:  Caroline Praz; Benedikt Fasel; Philippe Vuistiner; Kamiar Aminian; Bengt Kayser
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Trends Supporting the In-Field Use of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Sport Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valentina Camomilla; Elena Bergamini; Silvia Fantozzi; Giuseppe Vannozzi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Exceptional Performance in Competitive Ski Mountaineering: An Inertial Sensor Case Study.

Authors:  Bengt Kayser; Benoit Mariani
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-05

4.  Steeper or Faster? Tactical Dispositions to Minimize Oxygen Cost in Ski Mountaineering.

Authors:  Arnstein Sunde; Fredrik Christoffersen; Jan-Michael Johansen; Øyvind Støren
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-01-31

5.  Heel riser height and slope gradient influence the kinematics and kinetics of ski mountaineering-A laboratory study.

Authors:  Michael Lasshofer; John Seifert; Anna-Maria Wörndle; Thomas Stöggl
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-08-18

6.  Assessment of Maximal Aerobic Capacity in Ski Mountaineering: A Laboratory-Based Study.

Authors:  Verena Menz; Martin Niedermeier; Rainer Stehle; Hendrik Mugele; Martin Faulhaber
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  In-Field Validation of an Inertial Sensor-Based System for Movement Analysis and Classification in Ski Mountaineering.

Authors:  Jules Gellaerts; Evgeny Bogdanov; Farzin Dadashi; Benoit Mariani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.