Literature DB >> 8145159

Neural and biomechanical specializations of human thumb muscles revealed by matching weights and grasping objects.

S L Kilbreath1, S C Gandevia.   

Abstract

1. Human manual dexterity has been linked by some to biomechanical adaptations of the hand and by others to neural adaptations. To investigate neural adaptations, the present study using the performance of four muscles acting on the index and thumb, quantified weight matching and electromyography. 2. The accuracy (i.e. reproducibility) of weight matching was used to investigate whether thumb muscles (i.e. flexor pollicis longus (FPL) and adductor pollicis (AP)) perform differently from index muscles (i.e. flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI)), and whether intrinsic hand muscles (AP and FDI) perform differently from extrinsic ones (FPL and FDP). 3. Subjects lifted reference weights on the right which represented predetermined percentages of a force generated in a maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) ranging from 2.5% to 35% MVC (and to 50% MVC in two muscles) and matched them with a variable weight lifted in the same way on the left. 4. Analysis of the coefficients of variation (c.v., expressed as a percentage) and the standard deviations calculated for repeated estimates of perceived heaviness, revealed significant differences in the accuracy of weight matching between different muscles and between reference weights. Based on the c.v., subjects lifted more accurately with FPL and AP (the two thumb muscles) than with the two index muscles. The two intrinsic hand muscles (FDI and AP) were equally accurate, and significantly more accurate than FDP which was the least accurate muscle. The high accuracy for FPL remained when accuracy was expressed in terms of the torque produced by the muscles when lifting the reference weights, and also when the torques were converted to absolute intramuscular forces. 5. Accuracy (based on c.v.) decreased significantly with light weights and increased with heavy weights for all muscles except FPL, which was equally accurate over a very wide range of weights (< 2.5% to 50% MVC). When data from all muscles were pooled, the c.v. increased from 12.9 to 19.1 as the weights lifted decreased from 35% to 2.5% MVC. 6. To examine the functional implications of the weight-matching study, electromyographic activity (EMG) was recorded with fine-wire electrodes from the same four muscles while subjects lifted cylinders of different widths (17-50 mm) and weights (15-1000 g). For recordings in which integrated EMG was linearly related to force up to maximal levels, the amplitudes of the EMGs at 'lift off' and at the mid-point of the 'hold' phase of the task were expressed relative to the maximal EMG during a MVC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8145159      PMCID: PMC1160501          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  29 in total

1.  Changes in perceived finger force produced by muscular contractions under isometric and anisometric conditions.

Authors:  N Mai; P Schreiber; J Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Accuracy of weight estimation for weights lifted by proximal and distal muscles of the human upper limb.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; S L Kilbreath
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  The output map of the primate motor cortex.

Authors:  R Lemon
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 4.  Force sensation in fresh and fatigued human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  E Cafarelli
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.230

Review 5.  Perception of force and weight: theory and research.

Authors:  L A Jones
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Projection from low-threshold muscle afferents of hand and forearm to area 3a of baboon's cortex.

Authors:  C G Phillips; T P Powell; M Wiesendanger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Morphologic regions of the multitendoned extrinsic finger muscles in the monkey forearm.

Authors:  D M Serlin; M H Schieber
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1993

8.  Alterations in perceived heaviness during digital anaesthesia.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D I McCloskey; E K Potter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  A quantitative analysis of sensations of tension and of kinaesthesia in man. Evidence for a peripherally originating muscular sense and for a sense of effort.

Authors:  P E Roland; H Ladegaard-Pedersen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Changes in perceived heaviness and motor commands produced by cutaneous reflexes in man.

Authors:  A M Aniss; S C Gandevia; R J Milne
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  15 in total

1.  Perceptual constancy and the perceived magnitude of muscle forces.

Authors:  Lynette A Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Heaviness perception. III. Weight/aperture in the discernment of heaviness in cubes haptically perceived by thumb-index finger grasp.

Authors:  Satoru Kawai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Constraints for control of the human hand.

Authors:  Hiske van Duinen; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Contribution of tactile feedback from the hand to the perception of force.

Authors:  Lynette A Jones; Erin Piateski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Thumb and finger forces produced by motor units in the long flexor of the human thumb.

Authors:  W S Yu; S L Kilbreath; R C Fitzpatrick; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Activation of individual extrinsic thumb muscles and compartments of extrinsic finger muscles.

Authors:  J Alexander Birdwell; Levi J Hargrove; Todd A Kuiken; Richard F Ff Weir
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neuromuscular-skeletal constraints upon the dynamics of perception-action coupling.

Authors:  R G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; C M Phegan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  EMG activation patterns during force production in precision grip. I. Contribution of 15 finger muscles to isometric force.

Authors:  M A Maier; M C Hepp-Reymond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Extrinsic finger and thumb muscles command a virtual hand to allow individual finger and grasp control.

Authors:  J Alexander Birdwell; Levi J Hargrove; Richard F ff Weir; Todd A Kuiken
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.