| Literature DB >> 8141081 |
G S Mintz1, A D Pichard, J A Kovach, K M Kent, L F Satler, S P Javier, J J Popma, M B Leon.
Abstract
Preintervention intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging was performed in 313 target lesions in 301 patients. Revascularization strategy intended before imaging was compared with the treatment actually performed; there was a change in therapy in 124 lesions (40%) in 121 patients (40%). This included: (1) assessment of lesion severity leading to revascularization when none had been planned (n = 20, 6%), (2) avoiding surgery or catheter-based revascularization that had originally been planned (n = 21, 7%), and (3) assessment of lesion composition leading to a change in revascularization strategy (n = 20, 6%) or for selecting the revascularization strategy (n = 63, 20%). Nine of these 121 patients were referred for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. IVUS minimal lumen diameter correlated well with angiography (r = 0.83); however, a disagreement was the reason for deciding to perform or not to perform revascularization in 41 lesions (13%). IVUS assessment of target lesion calcification, eccentricity and unusual morphology were the reasons for changing or selecting specific devices: (1) concentric and eccentric lesions with significant superficial calcium were treated with rotational atherectomy, excimer laser angioplasty or surgery; (2) eccentric lesions that did not contain significant superficial calcium were treated with directional atherectomy; (3) dissections and true aneurysms were treated with stent placement even if calcified; (4) thrombus-containing lesions in vein grafts were treated with thrombolytic therapy or extraction atherectomy, or both; and (5) fibrotic vein graft lesions were treated with balloon angioplasty or stent placement.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1994 PMID: 8141081 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90670-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Cardiol ISSN: 0002-9149 Impact factor: 2.778