Literature DB >> 8139058

Fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Is mortality reduced by chance selection for screening colonoscopy?

C A Lang1, D F Ransohoff.   

Abstract

Annual fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening using rehydrated Hemoccult slides has been reported in the Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study to reduce colorectal cancer mortality by about 33%. However, some of the benefit of FOBT screening may come from "chance" selection of persons for colonoscopic examination because of the high positivity rate of FOBT (about 10%) that may occur for reasons other than a bleeding cancer or polyp. To determine how much this mechanism could account for the benefit of FOBT screening, we used a simple mathematical model to simulate the course of a cohort of screened persons, incorporating published data including those from the Minnesota study. The results suggest that one third to one half of the mortality reduction observed from FOBT screening in the Minnesota study may be attributable to chance selection for colonoscopy. We conclude that annual FOBT screening with rehydration is a haphazard method for selecting persons for colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8139058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  13 in total

1.  Protective effect of faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer: worse prognosis for screening refusers.

Authors:  Y Niv; M Lev-El; G Fraser; G Abuksis; A Tamir
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Results of a pilot study of endoscopic screening of first degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients in Italy.

Authors:  L Colombo; G Corti; F Magrì; A Marocchi; P Brambilla; C Crespi; L Manieri; S Ghezzi; D Giannone; L Merlino; P Mocarelli
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult.

Authors:  P Hewitson; P Glasziou; L Irwig; B Towler; E Watson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

4.  [Screening: prerequisites].

Authors:  M Hoffmeister; U Haug; H Brenner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer screening 2000: the role of colonoscopy in average-risk individuals.

Authors:  W E Smalley; G M Eisen
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-10

6.  Higher physician density is associated with lower incidence of late-stage colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Raymond G Hoffmann; Kia Saeian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Reduction of the incidence and mortality of rectal cancer by polypectomy: a prospective cohort study in Haining County.

Authors:  Shu Zheng; Xi-Yong Liu; Ke-Feng Ding; Lin-Bo Wang; Pei-Lin Qiu; Xin-Feng Ding; Yong-Zhou Shen; Gao-Fei Shen; Qi-Rong Sun; Wei-Dong Li; Qi Dong; Su-Zhan Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Improving the quality of colorectal cancer screening: assessment of familial risk.

Authors:  Lynn F Butterly; Martha Goodrich; Tracy Onega; Mary Ann Greene; Amitabh Srivastava; Randall Burt; Allen Dietrich
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Association of FOBT-assessed faecal Hb content with colonic lesions detected in the Florence screening programme.

Authors:  S Ciatto; F Martinelli; G Castiglione; P Mantellini; T Rubeca; G Grazzini; A G Bonanomi; M Confortini; M Zappa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Øyvind Holme; Michael Bretthauer; Atle Fretheim; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Geir Hoff
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.