Literature DB >> 8138500

Technical note: detection of bias in genetic predictions.

A Reverter1, B L Golden, R M Bourdon, J S Brinks.   

Abstract

The theoretical development of a procedure to detect bias in genetic predictions is presented. The procedure is based on the expectation of three statistics. These statistics detect bias by identifying systematic, unexpected change in subsequent analyses. Expectations of the following statistics were obtained: linear correlation coefficient between subsequent predictions, linear regression of recent (more accurate) on previous (less accurate) genetic prediction, and variance of the genetic prediction difference (recent minus previous genetic prediction). Deviations from these expectations can be used to indicate bias. The covariance between subsequent BLUP of genetic value is shown to equal the variance of the early estimate, implying that the expected value of the regression of recent on previous genetic prediction equals 1 regardless of the distribution of the observations and predictions. Also, the expected value of the linear correlation coefficient between subsequent genetic predictions equals the square root of the ratio of the means of the square of accuracy values. The expected value of the variance of the genetic prediction difference was shown to be equal to the difference between prediction error variances.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8138500     DOI: 10.2527/1994.72134x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

Review 1.  Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters.

Authors:  Robin Thompson; Sue Brotherstone; Ian M S White
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Prediction of Complex Traits: Robust Alternatives to Best Linear Unbiased Prediction.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Alessio Cecchinato; Hugo Naya; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Semi-parametric estimates of population accuracy and bias of predictions of breeding values and future phenotypes using the LR method.

Authors:  Andres Legarra; Antonio Reverter
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Inclusion of sire by herd interaction effect in the genomic evaluation for weaning weight of American Angus.

Authors:  Sungbong Jang; Daniela Lourenco; Stephen Miller
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  Correcting for base-population differences and unknown parent groups in single-step genomic predictions of Norwegian Red cattle.

Authors:  Tesfaye K Belay; Leiv S Eikje; Arne B Gjuvsland; Øyvind Nordbø; Thierry Tribout; Theo Meuwissen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

6.  Predicting the accuracy of genomic predictions.

Authors:  Jack C M Dekkers; Hailin Su; Jian Cheng
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Reliability of genomic evaluation for egg quality traits in layers.

Authors:  David Picard Druet; Amandine Varenne; Florian Herry; Frédéric Hérault; Sophie Allais; Thierry Burlot; Pascale Le Roy
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.797

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.