Literature DB >> 8137191

Temporal trends in breast cancer surgery in Ontario: can one randomized trial make a difference?

N A Iscoe1, C D Naylor, J I Williams, G DeBoer, M W Morgan, G Fehringer, E Holowaty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a single randomized clinical trial, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) B-06, on the surgical management of breast cancer in women.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: All hospitals in Ontario. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 37,447 women with breast cancer newly diagnosed from Jan. 1, 1980, to Dec. 31, 1989, linked to a surgical procedure record in the Ontario Cancer Registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The most invasive surgical procedure used within 90 days of diagnosis.
RESULTS: Unilateral breast-ablative surgery (BAS) was performed in 57.3% of the women and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in 31.6%. The annual rate of BAS declined from 77.5% in 1980 to 44.2% in 1989 and the rate of BCS rose from 12.5% in 1980 to 43.5% in 1989. The decline was linear from 1980 to 1984 and then accelerated significantly in 1985 (p < 0.0001), after the results of the NSABP B-06 trial were published.
CONCLUSION: One randomized clinical trial can have an immediate and profound effect on medical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8137191      PMCID: PMC1486399     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  11 in total

1.  Do the results of randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular drugs influence medical practice? The SAVE Investigators.

Authors:  G A Lamas; M A Pfeffer; P Hamm; J Wertheimer; J L Rouleau; E Braunwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-07-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Consensus on treatment of early stage breast cancer: less surgery, more research.

Authors:  K Smigel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians.

Authors:  J Lomas; G M Anderson; K Domnick-Pierre; E Vayda; M W Enkin; W J Hannah
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. A first report of results from a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  B Fisher; E Montague; C Redmond; B Barton; D Borland; E R Fisher; M Deutsch; G Schwarz; R Margolese; W Donegan; H Volk; C Konvolinka; B Gardner; I Cohn; G Lesnick; A B Cruz; W Lawrence; T Nealon; H Butcher; R Lawton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Clinical evaluation: how does it influence medical practice?

Authors:  H V Fineberg
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.276

6.  The 1982 national survey of carcinoma of the breast in the United States by the American College of Surgeons.

Authors:  R E Wilson; W L Donegan; C Mettlin; N Natarajan; C R Smart; G P Murphy
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1984-10

7.  Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  A B Nattinger; M S Gottlieb; J Veum; D Yahnke; J S Goodwin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer.

Authors:  D C Farrow; W C Hunt; J M Samet
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast.

Authors:  U Veronesi; R Saccozzi; M Del Vecchio; A Banfi; C Clemente; M De Lena; G Gallus; M Greco; A Luini; E Marubini; G Muscolino; F Rilke; B Salvadori; A Zecchini; R Zucali
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; R Margolese; R Poisson; Y Pilch; C Redmond; E Fisher; N Wolmark; M Deutsch; E Montague
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  We may get this horse to water, but will it drink?

Authors:  N A Iscoe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.

Authors:  J E Till; D Osoba; J L Pater; J R Young
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Breast Cancer Guidelines in Canada: A Review of Development and Implementation.

Authors:  Amy Folkes; Robin Urquhart; Louise Zitzelsberger; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Canadian atrial fibrillation anticoagulation study: were the patients subsequently treated with warfarin? Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation Study Group.

Authors:  A Laupacis; K Sullivan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.