Literature DB >> 8134605

Which hurts the most? A comparison of pain rating during double-contrast barium enema examination and colonoscopy.

S Steine1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the degree of pain caused by double-contrast barium enema examination and colonoscopy and to compare pain ratings by patients and medical personnel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a random sample, 190 patients (aged 45-79 years) (mean, 63.1 years) recorded their experiences of pain during each procedure and the medical staff recorded their impressions of the patients' pain, on a 10-point progressive scale. The data were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank test, Spearman rank correlation, and generalized kappa value.
RESULTS: Patients' pain ratings were significantly higher during colonoscopy than during double-contrast barium enema examination (P < .0001). Pain was rated significantly higher by patients than by personnel for both procedures (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: In the choice of procedure, patients' high level of pain during colonoscopy should be remembered. The medical staff frequently underestimated patients' pain during both procedures, and this study documents a need for more extensive pain relief measures during potentially painful examinations of the large bowel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8134605     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Robert Richards
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-03-01

2.  Insufflation. Complications and recommendations.

Authors:  L D Picciano; B C Hansel; F A Luchette
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A survey of individual preference for colorectal cancer screening technique.

Authors:  Richard L Nelson; Alan Schwartz
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Assessment of the usefulness of a diagnostic test: a survey of patient preference for diagnostic techniques in the evaluation of intestinal inflammation.

Authors:  R L Nelson; A Schwartz; D Pavel
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Evidence-based Guidelines for Precision Risk Stratification-Based Screening (PRSBS) for Colorectal Cancer: Lessons learned from the US Armed Forces: Consensus and Future Directions.

Authors:  Itzhak Avital; Russell C Langan; Thomas A Summers; Scott R Steele; Scott A Waldman; Vadim Backman; Judy Yee; Aviram Nissan; Patrick Young; Craig Womeldorph; Paul Mancusco; Renee Mueller; Khristian Noto; Warren Grundfest; Anton J Bilchik; Mladjan Protic; Martin Daumer; John Eberhardt; Yan Gao Man; Björn Ldm Brücher; Alexander Stojadinovic
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.207

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.