Literature DB >> 8134246

Angular subtense effects on perception of polar and parallel projections of cubes.

A L Nicholls1, J M Kennedy.   

Abstract

Many authors contend that the perception of 2-D drawings of a 3-D object is governed by polar projective geometry. A problem for this position is that observers accept parallel projections, which are not produced with polar projective geometry, as accurate representations of 3-D objects. In Experiments 1 and 2, we used two different standards of comparison to study the perceptions of three line drawings of cubes--correct polar projections of cubes with subtenses of 15 degrees and 35 degrees, and a parallel projection--at five different angular subtenses. In Experiment 1, 14 observers judged each drawing when it subtended about 35 degrees, 15 degrees, 5 degrees, 4 degrees, and 2 degrees in width. Subjects used an 8-point rating scale to compare each drawing with a correct polar projection of a cube subtending 35 degrees, viewed with the drawing subtending 15 degrees. As predicted, both polar projections had their highest ratings at their correct vantage points. Ratings for the parallel projection were highest at small angular subtenses and decreased when it subtended 35 degrees. These findings were supported by a second experiment in which the 15 degrees polar projection was set at a 5 degrees viewing angle as a standard. In Experiment 3, 15 observers compared the three drawings, viewed at a second set of angular subtenses (30 degrees, 35 degrees, 40 degrees, 45 degrees, and 50 degrees), with a standard, the 35 degrees polar set at 45 degrees. Ratings fell with increases in viewing angle, and the parallel projection was rated lowest. The results indicate that parallel projections are assessed as polar projections that are correct for objects at a small angular subtense. Furthermore, projections at a small angular subtense are robust; that is, they are acceptable over a wide range of angular subtenses. We suggest that robustness can be explained by the modest variability in the proportions of pictures of cubes subtending small angles.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8134246     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  Judgments of size and distance in photographs.

Authors:  O W SMITH
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1958-09

2.  Compensation is unnecessary for the perception of faces in slanted pictures.

Authors:  T A Busey; N P Brady; J E Cutting
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

3.  Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle.

Authors:  E B Goldstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments.

Authors:  M W McGreevy; S R Ellis
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Shape constancy in pictorial representation.

Authors:  H Wallach; F J Marshall
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-04

6.  Geometric transformations of pictured space.

Authors:  J Farber; R R Rosinski
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Optic array determinants of apparent distance and size in pictures.

Authors:  J K Bengston; J C Stergios; J L Ward; R E Jester
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Picture perception: an analysis of visual compensation.

Authors:  R R Rosinski; T Mulholland; D Degelman; J Farber
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-12

9.  Rigidity in cinema seen from the front row, side aisle.

Authors:  J E Cutting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.332

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Visual perception of markings.

Authors:  W H Ittelson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-06

2.  The horizon-ratio relation as information for relative size in pictures.

Authors:  S Rogers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.