Literature DB >> 8134068

The modified Pereyra procedure in recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a 15-year review.

C H Holschneider1, S Solh, T B Lebherz, F J Montz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and perioperative morbidity of the modified Pereyra procedure in the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence.
METHODS: Data of 54 patients who underwent a modified Pereyra procedure for the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence between January 1, 1978, and August 1, 1992, were analyzed retrospectively regarding presenting symptoms, preoperative evaluation, surgical procedure, complications, and cure and failure rates. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the preoperative absence (group I) or presence (group II) of risk factors for repeated failure (detrusor instability, low-pressure urethra, fibrotic urethra, negative Q-tip test, and neurogenic incontinence).
RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 36.3 months, the cure rate of 81.6% in group I (N = 38) was significantly (P = .005) higher than that in group II (N = 16; 43.8% cured). The mean time of occurrence of failure was 11.9 months for group I and 6.8 months for group II. The incidence of intraoperative complications (Pereyra suture in bladder, hemorrhage) for both groups was 7.4%. Immediate postoperative complications were found in 25.9% of all patients; these were mainly infectious processes. Late postoperative complications occurred in 33.3%, with the most prevalent being new-onset urge incontinence and de novo detrusor instability (11.1%) and obstructive voiding dysfunction (9.3%). The rates of perioperative morbidity were not significantly different between the groups.
CONCLUSION: The modified Pereyra procedure is well suited for the treatment of uncomplicated recurrent stress urinary incontinence, with a long-term cure rate of over 80%. However, success rates are significantly lower for recurrent stress incontinence in association with persistent risk factors for failure. In either instance, the procedure is associated with appreciable perioperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8134068     DOI: 10.1097/00006250-199404000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Various surgical approaches to treat voiding dysfunction following anti-incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey Segal; Andrew Steele; Brett Vassallo; Steven Kleeman; Andre W Silva; Rachel Pauls; Peggy Walsh; Mickey Karram
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-01-21

2.  Does bladder wall thickness decrease when obstruction is resolved?

Authors:  Annette Kuhn; Sonja Brandner; Peter Kuhn; Dudley Robinson; Luigi Raio
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Methods and results of urethrolysis.

Authors:  Jonathan S Starkman; Harriette Scarpero; Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 4.  Transvaginal retropubic sling systems: efficacy and patient acceptability.

Authors:  Christina P Moldovan; Michelle E Marinone; Andrea Staack
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-02-16

Review 5.  Current Treatments for Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions.

Authors:  Mun-Kun Hong; Dah-Ching Ding
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2019-10-24

Review 6.  De novo urge syndrome and detrusor instability after anti-incontinence surgery: current concepts, evaluation, and treatment.

Authors:  Richard T Kershen; Rodney A Appell
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.862

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.