Literature DB >> 22249277

Does bladder wall thickness decrease when obstruction is resolved?

Annette Kuhn1, Sonja Brandner, Peter Kuhn, Dudley Robinson, Luigi Raio.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the current study was to determine if sonographic bladder wall thickness diminishes after symptomatic obstruction is resolved in female patients after stress incontinence surgery.
METHODS: Between December 2008 and December 2010, 62 female patients with symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction, as defined by Blaivas, who had undergone prior surgery for urinary stress incontinence were included in the study. The patients' history was taken and symptoms were noted. Patients underwent gynaecological examination, and multichannel urodynamic assessment was performed. Vaginal sonographic assessment of the bladder wall thickness (BWT) was performed before and after urethrolysis.
RESULTS: 62 patients were included in this study, 55 of whom had undergone suburethral sling insertion and seven had Burch colposuspension. Postoperatively, BWT decreased significantly from 9.1 mm  ±  2.1 to 7.6 mm  ±  2.2 (p < 0.0001). In seven patients, obstruction was still unresolved postoperatively; of these, two had undergone a retropubic sling insertion and two had a Burch colposuspension. An ROC curve analysis showed a significant positive association between residual urine and persistent obstruction before surgery (AUC 0.76, 95%CI 0.58-0.94; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: If obstruction is resolved, bladder wall thickness decreases. Preoperatively elevated residual urine may increase the risk of persistent obstruction after urethrolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22249277     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1642-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  29 in total

1.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 2.  Noninvasive methods of diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in men. Part 1: Nonurodynamic approach.

Authors:  Mohammed Belal; Paul Abrams
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  A novel technique for measuring bladder wall thickness in women using transvaginal ultrasound.

Authors:  V Khullar; S Salvatore; L Cardozo; T H Bourne; D Abbott; C Kelleher
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 4.  Voiding dysfunction.

Authors:  A Dörflinger; A Monga
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.927

5.  Urodynamics changes in voiding after anti-incontinence surgery: an insight into the mechanism of cure.

Authors:  J J Klutke; C G Klutke; J Bergman; G Elia
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  The evolution of obstruction induced overactive bladder symptoms following urethrolysis for female bladder outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Jonathan S Starkman; John W Duffy; Christopher E Wolter; Melissa R Kaufman; Harriette M Scarpero; Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Urodynamic investigations for management of urinary incontinence in adults.

Authors:  C M Glazener; M C Lapitan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

8.  An assessment of urodynamic examination in incontinent women.

Authors:  G J Jarvis; S Hall; S Stamp; D R Millar; A Johnson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1980-10

9.  The modified Pereyra procedure in recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a 15-year review.

Authors:  C H Holschneider; S Solh; T B Lebherz; F J Montz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Manual versus automatic bladder wall thickness measurements: a method comparison study.

Authors:  Matthias Oelke; Charalampos Mamoulakis; Dirk T Ubbink; Jean J de la Rosette; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.