Literature DB >> 8133366

Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of unilateral dislocated low subcondylar fractures: a clinical study of 52 cases.

N Worsaae1, J J Thorn.   

Abstract

To compare open versus closed reduction of unilaterally dislocated low subcondylar fractures in adults, 101 consecutive dentulous patients were treated either by closed reduction with a median of 4 weeks of maxillomandibular fixation, or with a median of 6 weeks of maxillomandibular fixation after surgical repositioning and transosseous wiring of the dislocated condylar fragment. No selection of patients was done for either treatment. Fifty-two patients were seen at a median of 2 years postoperatively. Complications such as malocclusion, mandibular asymmetry, impaired masticatory function, and pain located to the affected joint or masticatory muscles were seen significantly more frequent in patients treated with closed reduction compared with those treated surgically (P = .005). Neither the degree of dislocation of the proximal fragment, concomitant mandibular fractures, nor the absence of posterior occlusal support seemed to influence the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8133366     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90436-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  17 in total

1.  Risk of marginal mandibular nerve injury in neck dissection.

Authors:  Martin Nue Møller; Christian Hjort Sørensen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Complications of mandibular fracture: study of the treatment methods in calabar, Nigeria.

Authors:  C E Anyanechi; B D Saheeb
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 0.171

3.  [Transoral osteosynthesis of condylar neck fractures using a three-dimensional plate].

Authors:  G Lauer; W Pradel; M Schneider; U Eckelt
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-09

4.  Unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures: a retrospective clinical comparison of open versus closed treatment.

Authors:  Renata Porto Stypulkowski; Aline Gama Santos; Elvidio de Paula E Silva; Cícero André da Costa Moraes; Everton Luis Santos da Rosa
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-05-08

5.  Comparative Evaluation of Modified Tragus Edge Approach and Retromandibular Approach to Mid- or Low-Level Mandibular Condylar Fractures.

Authors:  Praveen Kumar Singh; Geeta Singh; U Vignesh; Shadab Mohammad; R K Singh; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-04-07

6.  Complications of the use of trans-osseous wire osteosynthesis in the managementof compound, unfavorable and non-comminuted mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  Charles E Anyanechi; Otasowie D Osunde; Birch D Saheeb
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2016-09

7.  Prospective closed treatment of nondisplaced and nondislocated condylar neck and head fractures versus open reposition internal fixation of displaced and dislocated fractures.

Authors:  Constantin A Landes; Kai Day; Ruben Lipphardt; Robert Sader
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-07

8.  Evaluation of the Mandibular Function, after Nonsurgical Treatment of Unilateral Subcondylar Fracture: A 1-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Sudheesh K M; Rajendra Desai; Siva Bharani K Sn; Subhalakshmi S
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-07-08

9.  The maxillofacial injuries: A study.

Authors:  Vibha Singh; Laxman Malkunje; Shadab Mohammad; Nimisha Singh; Satish Dhasmana; Sanjib Kumar Das
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07

10.  Bilateral Mandibular Condylar Fractures with Associated External Auditory Canal Fractures and Otorrhagia.

Authors:  David Dang
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2016-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.