Literature DB >> 27516838

Evaluation of the Mandibular Function, after Nonsurgical Treatment of Unilateral Subcondylar Fracture: A 1-Year Follow-Up Study.

Sudheesh K M1, Rajendra Desai1, Siva Bharani K Sn1, Subhalakshmi S1.   

Abstract

There are no clearly defined guidelines for when an open or closed treatment is indicated for treatment of mandibular condylar fractures. The aim of the study is to analyze the mandibular function after nonsurgical treatment of unilateral subcondylar fractures, in a prospective study. A prospective study was conducted on 30 patients with unilateral mandibular subcondylar fracture undergoing nonsurgical treatment. Clinical and radiographic examinations were done prior to treatment and at 12-month follow-up. Pain, perceived occlusion, mouth opening, protrusion, and horizontal movements of the mandible were evaluated by clinical examination. Radiologic evaluation was done using Panoramic and Reverse Towne's radiographs. At 12-month follow-up, there was minimal pain in the temporomandibular joint region, there was an improvement in the perceived occlusion, and mouth opening did not reduce. There was insignificant absolute difference between left and right lateral mandibular movements. The amount of increase in the protrusion of mandible was insignificant. On radiographic evaluation, the degree of coronal and sagittal displacement was insignificant at follow-up. Mean ramus height pretreatment and 12 months posttreatment were 0.98 ± 0.50 and 0.87 ± 0.47, respectively. Based on this study, patients had adequate mandibular function and minimal pain after nonsurgical treatment. Unilateral subcondylar fractures of the mandible can be treated nonsurgically in patients with minimal occlusal discrepancies, adequate mouth opening, minimal displacement of condyle, and minimal ramus height shortening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  closed treatment; fracture; mandibular; nonsurgical; subcondylar

Year:  2016        PMID: 27516838      PMCID: PMC4980131          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1584399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  28 in total

1.  Changes in the pattern of fractures of the maxillofacial skeleton.

Authors:  G J van Beek; C A Merkx
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Connie Chen; Andrew M Brugger
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Complaints related to mandibular function impairment after closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle.

Authors:  E T Niezen; R R M Bos; L G M de Bont; B Stegenga; P U Dijkstra
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 4.  Condylar fractures: nonsurgical management.

Authors:  R V Walker
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Assessment of function following fracture of the mandible.

Authors:  G D Wood
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1980-09-02       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Comparison of functional recovery after nonsurgical and surgical treatment of condylar fractures.

Authors:  Y Takenoshita; H Ishibashi; M Oka
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Aetiology and incidence of facial fractures sustained during sports: a prospective study of 140 patients.

Authors:  E Maladière; F Bado; J P Meningaud; F Guilbert; J C Bertrand
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Retrospective analysis of 1502 patients with facial fractures.

Authors:  S Iida; M Kogo; T Sugiura; T Mima; T Matsuya
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 9.  Closed reduction, open reduction, and endoscopic assistance: current thoughts on the management of mandibular condyle fractures.

Authors:  Richard H Haug; M Todd Brandt
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Closed versus open operative treatment of nondisplaced diacapitular (Class VI) fractures.

Authors:  Constantin A Landes; Kai Day; Ruben Lipphardt; Robert Sader
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inter Maxillary Fixation Versus Open Reduction for the Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures: A Comparative Evaluation.

Authors:  Saba Nasreen; Anupam Bansal; Rathi Rela; Gaurav Rai; Ram Prasad Sah; Abhinav Raj Gupta
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.