Literature DB >> 8131360

Interbody fusion and instrumentation.

P Enker1, A D Steffee.   

Abstract

Fusion indications in adult degenerative disk disease of the lumbosacral spine include isolated disk resorption, primary and secondary instability, recurrent disk herniation, and pseudarthrosis. Common to these indications are variable proportions of biomechanical insufficiency of the motion segment, instability, deformity, and spinal stenosis. Apart from favorable psychosocial and work related variables, satisfactory outcome is dependent on treatment by a combination of diskectomy, decompression, and deformity correction, in addition to fusion. Isolated intertransverse or interbody fusions show variable fusion rates that are increased by concurrent instrumentation. Persistent pseudarthrosis rates and instrumentation failures have prompted circumferential fusion techniques. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and segmental pedicle-based plate fixation overcome earlier problems with PLIF by allowing for wide decompression and increased exposure for disk space preparation, minimizing neural injury. Pedicle fixation restores segmental stability and minimizes graft retropulsion. Restoration of anterior column support prolongs instrumentation life, and increases fusion rates irrespective of the number of levels fused. Disk space distraction, with the use of instrumentation as a working tool, permits safer decompression of the intraforaminal zone, a common area of stenosis, and single or multilevel deformity correction to restore coronal, axial, and sagittal alignment and spinal balance. Even though the surgical technique is demanding, fusion rates up to 96% and clinical success up to 86% are achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8131360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of SpineJet XL and Conventional Instrumentation for Disk Space Preparation in Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Han-Yong Huh; Cheol Ji; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-05-31

2.  Biomechanical and clinical study of single posterior oblique cage POLIF in the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Antonino Zagra; Laura Scaramuzzo; Fabio Galbusera; Leone Minoia; Marino Archetti; Fabrizio Giudici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Henry Halm; Viola Bullmann; Volker Vieth; Marc Schneider; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Facet joint violation during pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric study of the adult lumbosacral spine comparing the two pedicle screw insertion techniques.

Authors:  Kook Jin Chung; Seung Woo Suh; Keny Swapnil; Jae Hyuk Yang; Hae Ryong Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Surgery for degenerative lumbar disease: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Dieter Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparative observational study of surgical outcomes of lumbar foraminal stenosis using minimally invasive microsurgical extraforaminal decompression alone versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Jin-Hwa Jeong; Hyeon-Guk Cho; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  [Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis].

Authors:  M Quante; H Kesten; A Richter; H Halm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Adjacent segment degeneration and revision surgery after circumferential lumbar fusion: outcomes throughout 15 years of follow-up.

Authors:  José I Maruenda; Carlos Barrios; Felipe Garibo; Borja Maruenda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion.

Authors:  S S Madan; N R Boeree
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in adult spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Ching-Hsiao Yu; Chen-Ti Wang; Po-Quang Chen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.