Literature DB >> 8130709

Predictors of successful smoking cessation following advice from nurses in general practice.

D Sanders1, R Peveler, D Mant, G Fowler.   

Abstract

At follow-up of 751 subjects receiving a brief nurse-administered anti-smoking intervention in general practice, 135 subjects (18%) reported stopping smoking, of whom 44 (6%) reported sustained cessation for one year. The demographic, social and attitudinal characteristics of these subjects were compared with 616 subjects who continued to smoke. The most important predictors of cessation were intention to stop (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.1-12.0), personal rating of likelihood of cessation (OR 4.9, 95% CI 2.8-8.5), nurse rating of likelihood of cessation (OR 4.0, 95% CI 2.2-7.4), and smoking habit of partner (1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.9). As practice nurses are able to distinguish likely quitters from those who are not motivated and less likely to succeed, it is important to decide whether it is more cost effective to target support at the motivated or to spend more time encouraging less motivated. The most challenging, but possibly the most rewarding, task is to try to reduce the high proportion of new ex-smokers who relapse. Although 41.1% (95% CI 28.1, 58.0) of those expressing a definite intention to stop smoking gave up, only 17.9% (95% CI 8.9, 30.4) achieved sustained cessation. However, as sustained cessation is strongly predicted by social variables, such as marital status and time spent in the company of smokers, preventing relapse may not be easy to achieve through medical intervention alone.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8130709     DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02045.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  10 in total

Review 1.  Smoking cessation: integrating recent advances into clinical practice.

Authors:  T Coleman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Impact of different aspects of social participation and social capital on smoking cessation among daily smokers: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  M Lindström; S-O Isacsson; S Elmståhl
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Tobacco control activities of Iowa dental hygienists.

Authors:  A K Chambers; D E Corbin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1996-10

4.  Advising parents of asthmatic children on passive smoking: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  L Irvine; I K Crombie; R A Clark; P W Slane; C Feyerabend; K E Goodman; J I Cater
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-29

5.  Intermittent and daily smokers: two different socioeconomic patterns, and diverging influence of social participation.

Authors:  M Lindström; P O Ostergren
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Long term and transitional intermittent smokers: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  M Lindström; S-O Isacsson
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  College smokers' estimates of their probabilities of remaining a smoker in the near future.

Authors:  Isaac Lipkus; James Shepperd
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2009-05

8.  Which smokers are helped to give up smoking using transdermal nicotine patches? Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  P L Yudkin; L Jones; T Lancaster; G H Fowler
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Impact of Nicotine Replacement Therapy on post-cessation mood profile by pre-cessation depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Tellervo Korhonen; Taru H Kinnunen; Arthur J Garvey
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.600

10.  Do professional perspectives on evidence-based smoking cessation methods align? A Delphi study among researchers and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Daniëlle N Zijlstra; Ciska Hoving; Catherine Bolman; Jean W M Muris; Hein De Vries
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2022-01-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.