Literature DB >> 8731618

Which smokers are helped to give up smoking using transdermal nicotine patches? Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

P L Yudkin1, L Jones, T Lancaster, G H Fowler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nicotine replacement therapy is effective in helping people to give up smoking. The three forms now available--transdermal patches, chewing gum and nasal spray--deliver nicotine at different rates and to different levels. Therefore, it might be expected that smokers with different characteristics, and at different levels of nicotine dependence, will be helped more by one or other method. AIM: The aim of the study was to examine whether the effectiveness of transdermal patches is related to nicotine dependence or to other smoker characteristics and to investigate factors predicting smoking cessation using patches.
METHOD: Data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nicotine transdermal patches were analysed retrospectively. The trial, conducted in 1990-1992, involved 1686 patients recruited from 19 general practices in Oxfordshire. The main outcome measure was continuous smoking cessation from 8 to 52 weeks after the start of patch use, biochemically validated at 12, 24 and 52 weeks. The effectiveness of the patches was measured by the relative odds of sustained cessation using nicotine patches compared with placebo patches.
RESULTS: Nicotine transdermal patches were more effective in smokers with moderate nicotine dependence [odds ratio (OR) 1.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-3.04] than in mildly or highly dependent smokers (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.58-1.65) (difference in ORs P < 0.05) and more effective in those aged 24-49 years (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.24-2.87) than in older smokers aged 50-65 years (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.49-1.59) (difference in ORs P < 0.05). Abstinence from smoking in the first week of the trial was the strongest predictor of sustained cessation and was more common among smokers using nicotine patches than those using placebo patches (33% of 842 compared with 22% of 844; P < 0.001). Of first-week abstainers, 25 and 28% of 277 and 182 in the nicotine and placebo groups, respectively, achieved sustained cessation compared with 4% of 565 and 2% of 662 first-week smokers.
CONCLUSION: Nicotine transdermal patches were most effective for smokers with moderate nicotine dependence and for younger smokers. Early abstinence from smoking was the strongest predictor of sustained cessation. A week's trial of the patch proceeding to longer term use if abstinence is achieved may be an effective policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8731618      PMCID: PMC1239570     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  21 in total

1.  Randomised controlled trial of nasal nicotine spray in smoking cessation.

Authors:  G Sutherland; J A Stapleton; M A Russell; M J Jarvis; P Hajek; M Belcher; C Feyerabend
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-08-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Age interacts with heaviness of smoking in predicting success in cessation of smoking.

Authors:  R B Coambs; S Li; L T Kozlowski
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Predictors of quitting smoking: the NHANES I followup experience.

Authors:  W P McWhorter; G M Boyd; M E Mattson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Quitting smoking in the United States in 1986.

Authors:  E J Hatziandreu; J P Pierce; M Lefkopoulou; M C Fiore; S L Mills; T E Novotny; G A Giovino; R M Davis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-09-05       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Debunking myths about self-quitting. Evidence from 10 prospective studies of persons who attempt to quit smoking by themselves.

Authors:  S Cohen; E Lichtenstein; J O Prochaska; J S Rossi; E R Gritz; C R Carr; C T Orleans; V J Schoenbach; L Biener; D Abrams
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1989-11

6.  Controlled trial of transdermal nicotine patch in tobacco withdrawal.

Authors:  T Abelin; A Buehler; P Müller; K Vesanen; P R Imhof
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-01-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Antismoking products.

Authors:  S G Gourlay; J J McNeil
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1990 Dec 3-17       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Who stopped smoking? Results from a panel survey of living conditions in Sweden.

Authors:  O Lundberg; B Rosén; M Rosén
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 9.  Clinical use of nicotine chewing-gum.

Authors:  M A Russell; M Raw; M J Jarvis
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-06-28

10.  Dose effects and predictors of outcome in a randomized trial of transdermal nicotine patches in general practice.

Authors:  J A Stapleton; M A Russell; C Feyerabend; S M Wiseman; G Gustavsson; U Sawe; D Wiseman
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  21 in total

1.  An evidence-based programme for smoking cessation: effectiveness in routine general practice.

Authors:  G Grandes; J M Cortada; A Arrazola
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Nicotine replacement therapy for a healthier nation. Nicotine replacement is cost effective and should be prescribable on the NHS.

Authors:  L Smeeth; G Fowler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-07

3.  Effects of escalating and descending schedules of incentives on cigarette smoking in smokers without plans to quit.

Authors:  Paul Romanowich; R J Lamb
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

4.  Smoking cessation in primary care - a randomized controlled trial of bupropione, nicotine replacements, CBT and a minimal intervention.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Eva Hoch; Jens Klotsche; Stephan Muehlig
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Contingency management for behavior change: applications to promote brief smoking cessation among opioid-maintained patients.

Authors:  Kelly E Dunn; Kathryn A Saulsgiver; Stacey C Sigmon
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Examining the effects of initial smoking abstinence on response to smoking-related stimuli and response inhibition in a human laboratory model.

Authors:  Matthew P Bradstreet; Stephen T Higgins; F Joseph McClernon; Rachel V Kozink; Joan M Skelly; Yukiko Washio; Alexa A Lopez; Marie A Parry
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Predictors of post-treatment relapse to smoking in successful quitters: pooled data from two phase III varenicline trials.

Authors:  Jaimee L Heffner; Theodore C Lee; Carmen Arteaga; Robert M Anthenelli
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Controlled trial of three weeks nicotine replacement treatment in hospital patients also given advice and support.

Authors:  S Hand; S Edwards; I A Campbell; R Cannings
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Shaping smoking cessation in hard-to-treat smokers.

Authors:  R J Lamb; Kimberly C Kirby; Andrew R Morral; Greg Galbicka; Martin Y Iguchi
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2010-02

10.  Changes in the relative reinforcing effects of cigarette smoking as a function of initial abstinence.

Authors:  Jin H Yoon; Stephen T Higgins; Matthew P Bradstreet; Gary J Badger; Colleen S Thomas
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.