Literature DB >> 8129485

A laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique for the repair of an indirect inguinal hernia.

R J Fitzgibbons1, G M Salerno, C J Filipi, W J Hunter, P Watson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was done (1) to determine whether congenital indirect inguinal hernias in male pigs could be repaired by placing a polypropylene mesh prosthesis over the defect intra-abdominally, (2) to measure the incidence of adhesions between intra-abdominal viscera and the prosthesis with and without the adhesion barrier oxidized regenerated cellulose, (3) to determine the incidence of other complications, and (4) to assess the effect on fertility. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Several techniques for laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy are currently being evaluated to determine whether there are advantages over conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy. Perhaps the most controversial is the intraperitoneal onlay mesh procedure (IPOM). Its advantage is its simplicity (in that the repair is accomplished by placing a prosthesis over the hernia defect intra-abdominally, avoiding a groin dissection). Its disadvantage is the potential for complications because the prosthesis is in contact with the intra-abdominal viscera.
METHODS: In male pigs, polypropylene mesh alone or polypropylene mesh plus the adhesion barrier oxidized regenerated cellulose (composite prosthesis) was fixed to the peritoneum surrounding the hernia defect. In phase 1 (6-week follow-up), two groups of 13 pigs each underwent herniorrhaphy at laparotomy or laparoscopy. In phase 2 (7.1-month follow-up), 21 pigs underwent laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.
RESULTS: All IPOM herniorrhaphies were successful. The prostheses adhered most frequently to the bladder, followed by small bowel, peritoneum, and cord structures. Prosthetic erosion into these organs was not observed. Laparoscopically placed prostheses in phases 1 and 2 had significantly less surface covered by adhesions (13% +/- 13% and 19% +/- 27%, respectively) and a lower adhesion tenacity grade (1.5 +/- 0.9 and 1.3 +/- 1.1, respectively) than those placed at laparotomy (44% +/- 27% and 2.5 +/- 0.7, respectively; p < 0.01). In phase 1, a histologic evaluation of laparoscopically placed specimens demonstrated significantly thinner above-mesh fibrotic tissue compared with the prostheses implanted at laparotomy (p < 0.04). In either phase, the use of the adhesion barrier did not produce any histologic difference between the polypropylene alone and the composite prosthesis. Fertility studies were performed in phase 2 and showed no adverse effects caused by either prosthesis.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the intraperitoneal placement of a polypropylene prosthesis was an effective technique for indirect inguinal herniorrhaphy in a pig. Furthermore, with laparotomy, the addition of oxidized regenerated cellulose significantly decreased the rate of adhesion formation to the prosthesis. However, oxidized regenerated cellulose would appear to have no value when used with a prosthesis placed laparoscopically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8129485      PMCID: PMC1243116          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199402000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  11 in total

1.  Tissue reaction to plastics; a comparison of nylon, orlon, dacron, teflon, and marlex.

Authors:  F C USHER; S A WALLACE
Journal:  AMA Arch Surg       Date:  1958-06

Review 2.  Inguinal hernia.

Authors:  L M Nyhus; M S Klein; F B Rogers
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  The preperitoneal approach and prosthetic buttress repair for recurrent hernia. The evolution of a technique.

Authors:  L M Nyhus; R Pollak; C T Bombeck; P E Donahue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Endoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  K Semm
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Comparison of sperm-rich fractions of boar semen collected by electroejaculation and the gloved-hand technique.

Authors:  V M Basurto-Kuba; L E Evans
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1981-05-01       Impact factor: 1.936

6.  The surgical repair of inguinal and femoral hernias.

Authors:  F Glassow
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1973-02-03       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  A model for sidewall adhesions in the rabbit: reduction by an absorbable barrier.

Authors:  M P Diamond; C B Linsky; T Cunningham; B Constantine; G S diZerega; A H DeCherney
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.425

8.  Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K A Zucker; R W Bailey; T R Gadacz; A L Imbembo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Management of acute full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall.

Authors:  H H Stone; T C Fabian; M L Turkleson; M J Jurkiewicz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Properitoneal prosthetic inguinal hernioplasty through a Pfannenstiel approach.

Authors:  D P Rignault
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1986-11
View more
  22 in total

1.  Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  N Katkhouda; E Mavor; M H Friedlander; R J Mason; M Kiyabu; S W Grant; K Achanta; E L Kirkman; K Narayanan; R Essani
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Novel technique of overlaying a poly-L: -lactic acid nanosheet for adhesion prophylaxis and fixation of intraperitoneal onlay polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Keiichi Fujino; Manabu Kinoshita; Akihiro Saitoh; Hidekazu Yano; Kahoko Nishikawa; Toshinori Fujie; Keiichi Iwaya; Minoru Kakihara; Shinji Takeoka; Daizoh Saitoh; Yuji Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is there a risk of infertility after inguinal mesh repair? Experimental studies in the pig and the rabbit.

Authors:  Christian Peiper; Karsten Junge; Uwe Klinge; Eva Strehlau; A Ottinger; Volker Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Does the additional application of a polylactide film (SurgiWrap) to a lightweight mesh (TiMesh) reduce adhesions after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation procedures? Experimental results obtained with the laparoscopic porcine model.

Authors:  Christine Schug-Pass; Florian Sommerer; Andrea Tannapfel; Hans Lippert; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The use of composite meshes in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias: are there differences in biocompatibily?: experimental results obtained in a laparoscopic porcine model.

Authors:  Christine Schug-Pass; Florian Sommerer; Andrea Tannapfel; Hans Lippert; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair as a day surgical procedure.

Authors:  J R Bessell; P Baxter; P Riddell; S Watkin; G J Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  IPOM: history of an acronym.

Authors:  F Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Single-incision laparoscopic TAPP mesh hernioplasty using conventional instruments: an evolving technique.

Authors:  Prabal Roy; Anushtup De
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Incidence of adhesions between intra-abdominal viscera and a polypropylene mesh prosthesis.

Authors:  N A Gomez; C J Leon; S A Iñiguez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The effects of inguinal hernia repair on testicular function in young adults: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  I Sucullu; A I Filiz; B Sen; Y Ozdemir; E Yucel; H Sinan; H Sen; O Dandin; Y Kurt; B Gulec; M Ozyurt
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.