Literature DB >> 8127992

Re-examination of the psychometric characteristics of the La Monica-Oberst Patient Satisfaction Scale.

B H Munro1, B S Jacobsen, D A Brooten.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide further psychometric testing of the 41-item La Monica-Oberst Patient Satisfaction Scale (LOPSS). Data were drawn from three studies designed to study a model of nurse specialist transitional care (n = 307). Previously, the scale had been tested with oncology patients. This study included three groups of nononcologic female patients. Potential scores on the LOPSS range from 41 to 205; actual scores ranged from 93 to 205, with a mean of 175 (SD = 24), indicating a positively skewed distribution. Coefficient alpha for the entire scale was .98. An examination of the individual items indicated that the LOPSS might be shortened without subsequent loss of information. Thirteen items with low item-total correlations or low variability were dropped. The resulting 28-item scale had a mean of 118.7 and a SD of 17.3. Coefficient alpha was .97. The results of a factor analysis of the revised scale were similar to those reported by La Monica, Oberst, Madea, and Wolf (1986). The results indicate that the scale is useful for nononcologic patients. The difficulty remains the positively skewed distribution of scores. More sensitive items need to be developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8127992      PMCID: PMC3732165          DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770170207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  11 in total

1.  Compendium of instruments measuring patient satisfaction with nursing care.

Authors:  C McDaniel; J G Nash
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1990-05

2.  Measuring the effectiveness of nursing practice.

Authors:  M D Naylor; B H Munro; D A Brooten
Journal:  Clin Nurse Spec       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.067

Review 3.  Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care.

Authors:  P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Incorporating patient satisfaction standards into quality of care measures.

Authors:  L Strasen
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.737

5.  Development of an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with nurses and nursing care in primary care settings.

Authors:  N L Risser
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1975 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 6.  Outcome measurement: concepts and questions.

Authors:  K N Lohr
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

7.  Factors influencing inpatient satisfaction with care.

Authors:  E R Doering
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1983-10

8.  Analyzing patient satisfaction: a multianalytic approach.

Authors:  S Abramowitz; A A Coté; E Berry
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1987-04

9.  A Patient Satisfaction Instrument: precision by replication.

Authors:  A S Hinshaw; J R Atwood
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Development of a patient satisfaction scale.

Authors:  E L La Monica; M T Oberst; A R Madea; R M Wolf
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.228

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of pharmacist care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Han Zhong; Xiao-Jun Ni; Min Cui; Xiao-Yan Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-10-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.