Literature DB >> 2966125

Outcome measurement: concepts and questions.

K N Lohr.   

Abstract

Outcome measurement-a central concept of quality of care-has both conceptual appeal and limitations as a practical assessment tool. The degree to which outcomes can be directly related to processes of care continues to be especially problematic. I view the continued debate about whether processes or outcomes are the preferable measure of quality as fundamentally unproductive, because both are needed. To strengthen our understanding of both measures in ascertaining quality of care, I suggest that work in four areas is needed: more definitive evidence of process and outcome linkages; stronger relationships between technology assessment and quality assessment; improved reliability and validity of outcome measures as screening tools; and continued development of health status measures.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2966125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inquiry        ISSN: 0046-9580            Impact factor:   1.730


  46 in total

1.  Quality of life as an instrument for need assessment and outcome assessment of health care in chronic patients.

Authors:  G A van den Bos; A H Triemstra
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

Review 2.  Synthesis of research on the costs of institutional and community-based care.

Authors:  D Mitchell; D Braddock; R Hemp
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1990

3.  Measuring program performance in methadone treatment using in-treatment outcomes: an illustration.

Authors:  C D Phillips; R L Hubbard; G Dunteman; D L Fountain; D Czechowicz; J R Cooper
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1995

4.  Putting continuous quality improvement into accreditation: improving approaches to quality assessment.

Authors:  E Scrivens
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-12

5.  Standardized nursing language for healthcare information systems.

Authors:  C Delaney; P A Mehmert; C Prophet; S L Bellinger; D G Huber; S Ellerbe
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 6.  Practical experiences in auditing patient outcomes.

Authors:  M J Bardsley; J M Coles
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-06

7.  Routine data: a resource for clinical audit?

Authors:  M McKee
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-06

Review 8.  Nausea and vomiting after surgery under general anesthesia: an evidence-based review concerning risk assessment, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  Dirk Rüsch; Leopold H J Eberhart; Jan Wallenborn; Peter Kranke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 9.  A systematic review: how to choose appropriate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in routine general practice?

Authors:  Tian-Hui Chen; Lu Li; Michael M Kochen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 10.  Outcome measures and needs assessment tools for schizophrenia and related disorders.

Authors:  S M Gilbody; A O House; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.