Literature DB >> 8127278

Low polarization pacing lead for detecting the ventricular-evoked response.

A Bolz1, M Hubmann, R Hardt, J Riedmüller, M Schaldach.   

Abstract

The cardiac response to a pacing pulse is potentially useful for rate adaptive pacemakers and threshold tracking systems. However, until now capture recognition of the ventricular-evoked response by the use of a single electrode for stimulation as well as detection was limited by the electrode polarization. Electronic measures against the stimulus polarization artifact have not been successful due to the variability of the after potential or the requirement of additional battery power. Following the idea of Lewin, Myers and Parsonnet, who introduced the idea of a non-polarizable porous electrode for physiological stimulation, titanium nitride (TiN) and iridium (Ir) coatings with fractal surface structure have been developed with high electro-chemical active surface areas and Helmholtz double-layer capacities of up to 50,000 microF/cm2, thus reducing the polarization artifact significantly. Two types of endocardial leads (10 with a fractal TiN coating and 5 with a fractal Ir coating) were implanted in the apex of the right ventricle and the polarization artifact, as well as the evoked response, was measured. Both types of pacing leads show a 90% reduction in the polarization artifact in comparison to conventional leads. If an autoshort of approximately 20 to 50 ms is applied after the pacing pulse, the polarization artifact of these leads is negligible, thus enabling reliable detection of at least the repolarization phase of the ventricular-evoked response, which is fully sufficient for capture recognition. Additionally, due to their low polarization losses, TiN- or Ir-coated electrodes with fractal surface structure have a unique stimulation and detection performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8127278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Prog Technol        ISSN: 0047-6552


  4 in total

Review 1.  Threshold tracking pacing based on beat by beat evoked response detection: clinical benefits and potential problems.

Authors:  F Duru; U Bauersfeld; H Schüller; R Candinas
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Prediction of the onset of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery using the monophasic action potential.

Authors:  A M Pichlmaier; V Lang; W Harringer; B Heublein; M Schaldach; A Haverich
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Generation of Monophasic Action Potentials and Intermediate Forms.

Authors:  Shahriar Iravanian; Ilija Uzelac; Conner Herndon; Jonathan J Langberg; Flavio H Fenton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Tissue damage thresholds during therapeutic electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan; Kip A Ludwig; Cristin G Welle; Pavel Takmakov
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.