Literature DB >> 8126402

How do family physicians prioritize delivery of multiple preventive services?

K C Stange1, T Fedirko, S J Zyzanski, C R Jaén.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In spite of the recommendations of experts, little is known about the priority that physicians assign to various preventive services provided to patients within the time pressures and competing demands of the office visit.
METHODS: A survey presenting the case of a 53-year-old woman was sent to a national random sample of 480 practicing family physicians. Physicians were asked which items on a list of preventive services they would provide during 5 minutes remaining at the end of an illness visit for sinusitis, and during a visit for a 30-minute physical examination. Descriptive analyses rank ordered the most commonly provided services. Additional analyses using chi-square and analysis of variance were used to characterize physicians who performed high and low levels of services recommended and not recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).
RESULTS: Among 268 responding physicians, more than 50% provided smoking cessation advice, blood pressure, height, and weight measurements, and the scheduling of a return visit during the illness visit. During a physical examination visit, many other services, including breast examination, Papanicolaou test, pelvic examination, and ordering a mammogram were also commonly chosen. Physicians performing a high level of USPSTF-recommended preventive services and a low level of not recommended services were characterized by their young age, residency training, not being in solo practice, and greater experience with USPSTF recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians offer more preventive services during patient visits for physical examinations than during visits for illness. Physician characteristics associated with the delivery of recommended levels of preventive services may be useful in identifying interventions that will direct medical resources toward the most effective preventive services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8126402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  17 in total

1.  [Population-related and individual prevention. Strategies and effectiveness].

Authors:  U Walter
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Nonsymptomatic Factors More Strongly Associated with High-Quality End-of-Life Care than Symptomatic Factors for Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Authors:  Gayle Kricke; Donna Woods; Alicia Arbaje; Neil Jordan
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Does patient educational level affect office visits to family physicians?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Meredith A Goodwin; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Does Receiving Clinical Preventive Services Vary across Different Types of Primary Healthcare Organizations? Evidence from a Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Sylvie Provost; Raynald Pineault; Jean-Frédéric Levesque; Stéphane Groulx; Geneviève Baron; Danièle Roberge; Marjolaine Hamel
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-11

5.  Health state information derived from secondary databases is affected by multiple sources of bias.

Authors:  Darcey D Terris; David G Litaker; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Qualitative responses to a national physician survey on HPV vaccination.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Devin Murphy; Maria Rodriguez; Teri L Malo; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Prevention services in primary care: taking time, setting priorities.

Authors:  M Rafferty
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-11

8.  When there is too much to do: how practicing physicians prioritize among recommended interventions.

Authors:  Timothy P Hofer; Judith K Zemencuk; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Physician visits, patient comorbidities, and mammography use among elderly colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Xinhua Yu; A Marshall McBean; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 10.  Review of evidence and explanations for suboptimal screening and treatment of dyslipidemia in women. A conceptual model.

Authors:  Catherine Kim; Timothy P Hofer; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.