Literature DB >> 8125004

Components of the work of breathing and implications for monitoring ventilator-dependent patients.

M J Banner1, M J Jaeger, R R Kirby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: a) To discuss the components of the work of breathing using an established physiologic model (Campbell diagram); b) to describe the requirements of a monitor to measure work; and c) to discuss the implications and relevance for assessing the work of breathing of ventilator-dependent patients. DATA SOURCES: Relevant articles from the medical and physiologic literature are referenced, as well as the authors' experience. STUDY SELECTION: Identified (by authors) laboratory and clinical research establishing the need and physiologic importance for correctly measuring the work of breathing. DATA EXTRACTION: A physiologic model of the various components of the work of breathing is used in conjunction with data from published literature. SYNTHESIS: Diagrams of increasing complexity based on the Campbell diagram depict the physiologic elastic and resistive work of breathing for the lungs and chest wall under normal and abnormal conditions. Decreases in compliance and increases in airways resistance are associated with increases in elastic and resistive work, respectively. A modification of the Campbell diagram to include an additional area depicting the imposed work of the breathing apparatus is suggested; i.e., the additional resistive load imposed on the respiratory muscles by the endotracheal tube, breathing circuit, and the ventilator's demand-flow system during spontaneous breathing. Increases in physiologic and/or imposed work result in respiratory muscle loading, predisposing to increases in oxygen consumption and the development of fatigue and hypercapnia. Measuring work of breathing by integrating the area of the esophageal pressure-volume loop alone underestimates the work of breathing relative to the Campbell diagram and, therefore, should not be used. Because the site of pressure measurement and mode of ventilation influence measurements of the work of breathing as well as compliance, clinicians should be aware of these factors when interpreting measurements. Monitors that are used in clinical practice to assess the work of breathing should be able to measure pressure at the airway opening (between the Y-piece of the breathing circuit and the endotracheal tube), at the carinal end of the endotracheal tube, and in the esophagus (inference of intrapleural pressure); as well as measure flow rate and volume at the airway opening; and calculate the various components of the work of breathing based on the Campbell diagram.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate measurement of physiologic and imposed work performed by the patient are essential to assess the afterload on the respiratory muscles, diagnose specific work of breathing abnormalities, and monitor the effects of interventions to mitigate respiratory muscle loading. Work of breathing data are useful in formulating objective guidelines for setting the ventilator appropriately to optimize respiratory muscle loads, e.g., selecting an appropriate amount of pressure support ventilation to decrease the work of breathing to a specific level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8125004     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199403000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  9 in total

1.  Work of breathing-tidal volume relationship: analysis on an in vitro model and clinical implications.

Authors:  G Natalini; D M Tuzzo; G Comunale; F A Rasulo; G Amicucci; A Candiani
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Noninvasive work of breathing improves prediction of post-extubation outcome.

Authors:  Michael J Banner; Neil R Euliano; A Daniel Martin; Nawar Al-Rawas; A Joseph Layon; Andrea Gabrielli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Abnormally increased power of breathing as a complication of closed endotracheal suction catheter systems.

Authors:  Mehmet S Ozcan; Steven W Bonett; A Daniel Martin; Andrea Gabrielli; A Joseph Layon; Michael J Banner
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.258

4.  Work of breathing using different interfaces in spontaneous positive pressure ventilation: helmet, face-mask, and endotracheal tube.

Authors:  Shinya Oda; Kei Otaki; Nozomi Yashima; Misato Kurota; Sachiko Matsushita; Airi Kumasaka; Hutaba Kurihara; Kaneyuki Kawamae
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Physiological effects and optimisation of nasal assist-control ventilation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in respiratory failure.

Authors:  C Girault; V Chevron; J C Richard; I Daudenthun; P Pasquis; J Leroy; G Bonmarchand
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Re-engineering ventilatory support to decrease days and improve resource utilization.

Authors:  O C Kirton; C B DeHaven; J Hudson-Civetta; J P Morgan; J Windsor; J M Civetta
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Unloading work of breathing during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: a bench study.

Authors:  Marc van Heerde; Karel Roubik; Vitek Kopelent; Frans B Plötz; Dick G Markhorst
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Characterizing and Modeling Breathing Dynamics: Flow Rate, Rhythm, Period, and Frequency.

Authors:  Nicholas J Napoli; Victoria R Rodrigues; Paul W Davenport
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Imposed work of breathing during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: a bench study.

Authors:  Marc van Heerde; Huib R van Genderingen; Tom Leenhoven; Karel Roubik; Frans B Plötz; Dick G Markhorst
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.