Literature DB >> 22113814

Noninvasive work of breathing improves prediction of post-extubation outcome.

Michael J Banner1, Neil R Euliano, A Daniel Martin, Nawar Al-Rawas, A Joseph Layon, Andrea Gabrielli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that non-invasively determined work of breathing per minute (WOB(N)/min) (esophageal balloon not required) may be useful for predicting extubation outcome, i.e., appropriate work of breathing values may be associated with extubation success, while inappropriately increased values may be associated with failure.
METHODS: Adult candidates for extubation were divided into a training set (n = 38) to determine threshold values of indices for assessing extubation and a prospective validation set (n = 59) to determine the predictive power of the threshold values for patients successfully extubated and those who failed extubation. All were evaluated for extubation during a spontaneous breathing trial (5 cmH(2)O pressure support ventilation, 5 cmH(2)O positive end expiratory pressure) using routine clinical practice standards. WOB(N)/min data were blinded to attending physicians. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of all extubation indices were determined.
RESULTS: AUC for WOB(N)/min was 0.96 and significantly greater (p < 0.05) than AUC for breathing frequency at 0.81, tidal volume at 0.61, breathing frequency-to-tidal volume ratio at 0.73, and other traditionally used indices. WOB(N)/min had a specificity of 0.83, the highest sensitivity at 0.96, positive predictive value at 0.84, and negative predictive value at 0.96 compared to all indices. For 95% of those successfully extubated, WOB(N)/min was ≤10 J/min.
CONCLUSIONS: WOB(N)/min had the greatest overall predictive accuracy for extubation compared to traditional indices. WOB(N)/min warrants consideration for use in a complementary manner with spontaneous breathing pattern data for predicting extubation outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22113814     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2402-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  37 in total

1.  Predicting extubation failure after successful completion of a spontaneous breathing trial.

Authors:  Babak Mokhlesi; Aiman Tulaimat; Ty J Gluckman; Yue Wang; Arthur T Evans; Thomas C Corbridge
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  Ventilation mode recognition using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  M A Leon; F L Lorini
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1997-10

3.  Comparison of standard weaning parameters and the mechanical work of breathing in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  J F Fiastro; M P Habib; B Y Shon; S C Campbell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications.

Authors:  P F Griner; R J Mayewski; A I Mushlin; P Greenland
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  The role of continuous positive airway pressure during weaning from mechanical ventilation in cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  C R Bailey; R M Jones; A A Kelleher
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  The measurement of the work of breathing for the clinical assessment of ventilator dependence.

Authors:  R J Henning; H Shubin; M H Weil
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Multicenter implementation of a consensus-developed, evidence-based, spontaneous breathing trial protocol.

Authors:  T Elizabeth Robertson; Henry J Mann; Robert Hyzy; Angela Rogers; Ivor Douglas; Aaron B Waxman; Craig Weinert; Philip Alapat; Kalpalatha K Guntupalli; Timothy G Buchman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation: clinical outcome in patients randomized for a 30-min or 120-min trial with pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  Andreas Perren; Guido Domenighetti; Simonetta Mauri; Franco Genini; Nicoletta Vizzardi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-07-13       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Respiratory function during pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  N R MacIntyre
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Clinical review: liberation from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Mohamad F El-Khatib; Pierre Bou-Khalil
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  7 in total

1.  Real time noninvasive estimation of work of breathing using facemask leak-corrected tidal volume during noninvasive pressure support: validation study.

Authors:  Michael J Banner; Carl G Tams; Neil R Euliano; Paul J Stephan; Trevor J Leavitt; A Daniel Martin; Nawar Al-Rawas; Andrea Gabrielli
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Assessment of diaphragmatic function by ultrasonography: Current approach and perspectives.

Authors:  Alain Boussuges; Sarah Rives; Julie Finance; Fabienne Brégeon
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Ventilatory equivalent for oxygen as an extubation outcome predictor: A pilot study.

Authors:  Troy Ellens; Ramandeep Kaur; Kelly Roehl; Meagan Dubosky; David L Vines
Journal:  Can J Respir Ther       Date:  2019-07-09

4.  Variables predicting weaning outcome in prolonged mechanically ventilated tracheotomized patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Alessandro Ghiani; Joanna Paderewska; Alexandros Sainis; Alexander Crispin; Swenja Walcher; Claus Neurohr
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2020-02-21

5.  Prediction of extubation outcome in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Flavia Torrini; Ségolène Gendreau; Johanna Morel; Guillaume Carteaux; Arnaud W Thille; Massimo Antonelli; Armand Mekontso Dessap
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2012: III. Noninvasive ventilation, monitoring and patient-ventilator interactions, acute respiratory distress syndrome, sedation, paediatrics and miscellanea.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Marc Bonten; Maurizio Cecconi; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; J R Curtis; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Salvatore M Maggiore; Jordi Mancebo; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Patricia Rocco; Jean-François Timsit; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  The effects of pressure- versus volume-controlled ventilation on ventilator work of breathing.

Authors:  Mojdeh Monjezi; Hamidreza Jamaati
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.819

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.