Literature DB >> 8123972

Comparison of prescription and medical records in reflecting patient antihypertensive drug therapy.

D B Christensen1, B Williams, H I Goldberg, D P Martin, R Engelberg, J P LoGerfo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the completeness of prescription records, and the extent to which they agreed with medical record drug entries for antihypertensive medications.
SETTING: Three clinics affiliated with two staff model health maintenance organizations (HMOs). PARTICIPANTS: Randomly selected HMO enrollees (n = 982) with diagnosed hypertension.
METHODS: Computer-based prescription records for antihypertensive medications were reviewed at each location using an algorithm to convert the directions-for-use codes into an amount to be consumed per day (prescribed daily dosage). The medical record was analyzed similarly for the presence of drug notations and directions for use.
RESULTS: There was a high level of agreement between the medical record and prescription file with respect to identifying the drug prescribed by drug name. Between 5 and 14 percent of medical record drug entries did not have corresponding prescription records, probably reflecting patient decisions not to have prescriptions filled at HMO-affiliated pharmacies or at all. Further, 5-8 percent of dispensed prescription records did not have corresponding medical record drug entry notations, probably reflecting incomplete recording of drug information on the medical record. The percentage of agreement of medical records on dosage ranged from 68 to 70 percent across two sites. Approximately 14 percent of drug records at one location and 21 percent of records at the other had nonmatching dosage information, probably reflecting dosage changes noted on the medical record but not reflected on pharmacy records.
CONCLUSIONS: In the sites studied, dispensed prescription records reasonably reflect chart drug entries for drug name, but not necessarily dosage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8123972     DOI: 10.1177/106002809402800119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  8 in total

Review 1.  Observational studies of antihypertensive medication use and compliance: is drug choice a factor in treatment adherence?

Authors:  K A Payne; S Esmonde-White
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  A comparison of self-reported oral contraceptive use and automated pharmacy data in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Leslie Spangler; Laura E Ichikawa; Rebecca A Hubbard; Belinda Operskalski; Andrea Z LaCroix; Susan M Ott; Delia Scholes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Information on drug use in the elderly: a comparison of pharmacy, general-practitioner and patient data.

Authors:  E R Heerdink; H G Leufkens; C Koppedraaijer; A Bakker
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1995-01-27

4.  Electronic communications and home blood pressure monitoring (e-BP) study: design, delivery, and evaluation framework.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; James D Ralston; Paul A Fishman; Sheryl L Catz; Andrea Cook; Jim Carlson; Lynda Tyll; David Carrell; Robert S Thompson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Agreement between the pharmacy medication history and patient interview for cardiovascular drugs: the Rotterdam elderly study.

Authors:  S I Sjahid; P D van der Linden; B H Stricker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Effects of initial antihypertensive drug class on patient persistence and compliance in a usual-care setting in the United States.

Authors:  Bimal V Patel; Rosemay A Remigio-Baker; Devi Mehta; Patrick Thiebaud; Feride Frech-Tamas; Ronald Preblick
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Medication documentation in a primary care network serving North Carolina medicaid patients: results of a cross-sectional chart review.

Authors:  Matthew D Olson; Gretchen L Tong; Beat D Steiner; Anthony J Viera; Evan Ashkin; Warren P Newton
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Improved persistence and adherence to diuretic fixed-dose combination therapy compared to diuretic monotherapy.

Authors:  Bimal V Patel; Rosemay A Remigio-Baker; Patrick Thiebaud; Ronald Preblick; Craig Plauschinat
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.