Literature DB >> 8121956

Combining graded categories: membership and typicality.

J Huttenlocher1, L V Hedges.   

Abstract

Forming a conjoint category (square tables) from constituent categories (squares and tables) has traditionally been modeled by formal set intersection. In this traditional view, in which categories are treated as precisely defined sets, an item is a member of the conjoint category if and only if it is a member of both constituent categories. However, as is now widely believed, many categories should be treated as graded, with members that vary in typicality and boundaries that are inexact. In the present article, it is argued that set intersection is inappropriate for combining graded categories. The authors propose an alternative formal mechanism in which a conjoint category is constructed from constituent categories by forming a joint distribution of values. The proposed model accounts for both membership and typicality of instances in conjoint categories, but only when the constituent categories are independent, or the relation between them is known.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8121956     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.1.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  4 in total

1.  Predicting conjunction typicalities by component typicalities.

Authors:  G Storms; P De Boeck; J A Hampton; I Van Mechelen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

2.  Not guppies, nor goldfish, but tumble dryers, Noriega, Jesse Jackson, panties, car crashes, bird books, and Stevie Wonder.

Authors:  G Storms; P De Boeck; I Van Mechelen; W Ruts
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

3.  Conceptual combination: conjunction and negation of natural concepts.

Authors:  J A Hampton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

4.  Semantic influences on episodic memory distortions.

Authors:  Alexa Tompary; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-01-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.