Literature DB >> 8120252

Comparative analysis of spectro-temporal receptive fields, reverse correlation functions, and frequency tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibers.

P J Kim1, E D Young.   

Abstract

The tuning properties of single auditory-nerve fibers (ANFs) are characterized with spectro-temporal receptive fields (STRFs), reverse correlation functions (revcors), and frequency tuning curves (FTCs). Measures of tuning and latency from the STRFs and revcors are largely comparable to the traditional measures of tuning from FTCs and measures of latency from peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs), but several important differences are found. As is well known, revcors can only characterize low (< 6 kHz) best frequency (BF) units, whereas STRFs are able to characterize all units studied (BFs ranging from 0.26-23 kHz), except for a few very low-BF examples. Whereas tuning bandwidth derived from revcor exceeds that measured from FTCs at all BFs and increases with sound level. STRF bandwidth is comparable to FTC bandwidth, except at low BFs, and is stable with sound level. The STRF may reflect nonlinear properties of auditory-nerve fibers such as refractoriness and two-tone suppression that are absent in the FTC and revcor characterizations. The principal drawback of the STRF is its narrow dynamic range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8120252     DOI: 10.1121/1.408335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained using natural sounds.

Authors:  F E Theunissen; K Sen; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Robust spectrotemporal reverse correlation for the auditory system: optimizing stimulus design.

Authors:  D J Klein; D A Depireux; J Z Simon; S A Shamma
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Preservation of spectrotemporal tuning between the nucleus laminaris and the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The role of broadband inhibition in the rate representation of spectral cues for sound localization in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Michael Anderson; Matthew Roos
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Nonlinear temporal receptive fields of neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Sharba Bandyopadhyay; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Two-dimensional adaptation in the auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee; Katherine I Nagel; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Balance or imbalance: inhibitory circuits for direction selectivity in the auditory system.

Authors:  Cal F Rabang; Jeff Lin; Guangying K Wu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Inhibition in the auditory brainstem enhances signal representation and regulates gain in complex acoustic environments.

Authors:  Christian Keine; Rudolf Rübsamen; Bernhard Englitz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  Information Processing by Onset Neurons in the Cat Auditory Brainstem.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; William S Rhode
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-26

10.  Spectral and temporal modulation tradeoff in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Francisco A Rodríguez; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.