Literature DB >> 8119427

The role of nasolacrimal intubation in the management of childhood epiphora.

R K Aggarwal1, G P Misson, I Donaldson, H E Willshaw.   

Abstract

Nasolacrimal intubation has been advocated to obviate the need for dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) for childhood epiphora which fails to resolve despite apparently successful probings. Twenty-eight intubations were attempted on children falling into this category. Of these, 25 were anatomically successful intubations (3 having had to be abandoned because of difficulties in retrieving the silicone tubes from the nose). Twenty patients (80%) had complete resolution of symptoms, 2 (8%) had improvement of symptoms such that no further intervention was necessary and 3 (12%) proceeded to DCR. A greater likelihood of a good outcome was seen if the tubes were left in situ for 6 months or more. We suggest that primary nasolacrimal intubation (that is nasolacrimal intubation without DCR) should be the next step in the management of childhood epiphora which fails to resolve after two probings. This approach may avoid a DCR in over 80% of children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8119427     DOI: 10.1038/eye.1993.177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  9 in total

1.  Management of childhood epiphora.

Authors:  J E Marr; A Drake-Lee; H E Willshaw
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  [Treatment of lacrimal stenosis. Causes, diagnostics, and surgical procedures].

Authors:  M B Bloching; J Prescher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Pediatric endocanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy: results of a minimally invasive surgical technique.

Authors:  Ismail Onder Uysal; Muammer Ozçimen; Halil Ibrahim Yener; Ali Kal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The course of epiphora after failure of silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Yanir Kassif; Uri Rehany; Michal David; Anna Popko; Shimon Rumelt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nasolacrimal duct intubation in children younger than 4 years of age.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; B Michele Melia; Roy W Beck; C Scott Atkinson; Danielle L Chandler; Jonathan M Holmes; Alexander Khammar; David Morrison; Graham E Quinn; David I Silbert; Benjamin H Ticho; David K Wallace; David R Weakley
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Balloon catheter dilation and nasolacrimal duct intubation for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed probing.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; Danielle L Chandler; Jonathan M Holmes; Darren L Hoover; Christine L Morse; Susan Schloff; David I Silbert; D Robbins Tien
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05

7.  Nasolacrimal duct intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children.

Authors:  S Okumuş; V Öner; C Durucu; E Coşkun; Ü Aksoy; E Durucu; L Şahin; I Erbağcı
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Monocanalicular Intubation in Children with Incomplete Complex Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Older Than Five Years of Age.

Authors:  Bahram Eshraghi; Mansooreh Jamshidian Tehrani; Fereshteh Tayebi; Bita Momenaei
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-06

9.  Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in children.

Authors:  Denis Knijnik
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.