Literature DB >> 8119003

A comparison of contact pressures in tibial and patellar total knee components before and after service in vivo.

J L McNamara1, J P Collier, M B Mayor, R E Jensen.   

Abstract

Laboratory testing of total knee components indicates that many designs produce contact stresses that exceed the yield strength of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylenes (UHMWPEs). It is often assumed that the polyethylene component will creep and wear to become more conforming over time, thus reducing these stresses. To test this theory, retrieved polyethylene tibial and patellar components, which showed signs of increased contact area through in vivo deformation, were tested for contact stress against matching components using Fuji Prescale pressure-sensitive film. The results showed an inverse relationship between initial conformity and in vivo changes in contact stress. More conforming devices showed little or no change in contact stress, and less conforming components showed small decreases in contact stress as a result of creep and wear. Even with these changes, however, the contact stresses for nonconforming designs remained well above those for the more conforming devices as well as the uniaxial yield strength of UHMWPE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8119003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James B Stiehl; Karel J Hamelynck; Paul E Voorhorst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Effect of an UHMWPE patellar component on stress fields in the patella: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Lee; Thay Q Lee; Joyce H Keyak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Stress distribution of the patellofemoral joint in the anatomic V-shape and curved dome-shape femoral component: a comparison of resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae.

Authors:  Chang-Hung Huang; Lin-I Hsu; Ting-Kuo Chang; Tai-Yuan Chuang; Shih-Liang Shih; Yung-Chang Lu; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Patellar polyethylene peg fracture: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mohamed Shafi; Young Yul Kim; Yeon Soo Lee; Jin Young Kim; Chang Whan Han
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The patella in total knee arthroplasty: to resurface or not is the question.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Sébastien Parratte; Nicolaas C Budhiparama
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

6.  The influence of the position of the patellar component on tracking in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R G Nelissen; L Weidenheim; W E Mikhail
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  The controversy of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Ibisne in medio tutissimus?

Authors:  Oliver S Schindler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Wear testing of moderate activities of daily living using in vivo measured knee joint loading.

Authors:  Jörn Reinders; Robert Sonntag; Leo Vot; Christian Gibney; Moritz Nowack; Jan Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Measuring the effect of femoral malrotation on knee joint biomechanics for total knee arthroplasty using computational simulation.

Authors:  K-T Kang; Y-G Koh; J Son; O-R Kwon; C Baek; S H Jung; K K Park
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.