Literature DB >> 8117759

Phenotype definition for genetic studies.

J P Rice1.   

Abstract

A difficulty in the interpretation of the reliability/stability of a lifetime diagnosis of mental disorders is the lack of a theoretical perspective. A model expressed in terms of the three unknowns-sensitivity, specificity and true base rate--is problematic due to the lack of a "gold standard", so that only two of these unknowns can be estimated. We extend this model to allow for clinical covariates that increase the likelihood that a positive case at Time 1 will be positive at Time 2. Under the assumption that all observed cases are true cases at the highest covariate values, we obtain a direct estimate of the sensitivity, so that all unknowns can be estimated. Moreover, we then calculate the likelihood that an observed case with given covariate levels is in fact a true case. The implications of diagnostic error for the fitting of genetic models are given. These methods are applied to stability data collected as part of the NIMH Psychobiology of Depression Program. A total of 1,629 relatives have been assessed with interviews separated by a 6-year interval. A logistic function was used to model the stability in relatives with an initial lifetime diagnosis of affective disorders. We discuss the use of these techniques in genetic models to increase information by defining an ordinal phenotype, use multiple assessments to minimize the impact of diagnostic error and increase the heritability, and utilize clinical covariates to model the certainty of diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8117759     DOI: 10.1007/bf02190722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0940-1334            Impact factor:   5.270


  25 in total

Review 1.  Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review.

Authors:  S D Walter; L M Irwig
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis without truth.

Authors:  R M Henkelman; I Kay; M J Bronskill
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1990 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  The stability of psychiatric diagnosis.

Authors:  R E Kendell
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 9.319

4.  Reliability studies of psychiatric diagnosis. Theory and practice.

Authors:  W M Grove; N C Andreasen; P McDonald-Scott; M B Keller; R W Shapiro
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1981-04

5.  Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research.

Authors:  J P Feighner; E Robins; S B Guze; R A Woodruff; G Winokur; R Munoz
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1972-01

6.  Stability of the diagnosis of primary affective disorder. A four-year follow-up study.

Authors:  C Faravelli; E Poli
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  The stability of diagnosis with an application to bipolar II disorder.

Authors:  J P Rice; P McDonald-Scott; J Endicott; W Coryell; W M Grove; M B Keller; D Altis
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  The estimation of diagnostic sensitivity using stability data: an application to major depressive disorder.

Authors:  J P Rice; J Endicott; M A Knesevich; N Rochberg
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.791

9.  Familial rates of affective disorder. A report from the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Study.

Authors:  N C Andreasen; J Rice; J Endicott; W Coryell; W M Grove; T Reich
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1987-05

10.  The familial transmission of bipolar illness.

Authors:  J Rice; T Reich; N C Andreasen; J Endicott; M Van Eerdewegh; R Fishman; R M Hirschfeld; G L Klerman
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1987-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.