Literature DB >> 811758

Response properties of macaque monkey chorda tympani fibers.

M Sato, H Ogawa, S Yamashita.   

Abstract

Many of the chorda tympani fibers of crab-eating monkeys respond to more than one of the four basic stimuli (NaCl, sucrose, HCl, and quinine hydrochloride) as well as cooling or warming of the tongue. Fibers could be classified into four categories depending on their best sensitivity to any one of the four basic stimuli. Sucrose-best and quinine-best fibers are rather specifically sensitive to sucrose and quinine, respectively, while salt-best and acid-best fibers respond relatively well to HCl and NaCl, respectively. Saccharin, dulcin, and Pb acetate produce a good response in sucrose-best fibers, but quinine-best and salt-best fibers also respond to saccharin. Highly significant positive correlations exist between amounts of responses to sucrose and those to saccharin, dulcin, and Pb acetate, indicating that these substances produce in the monkey a taste quality similar to that produced by sucrose. Compared with chroda tympani fibers of rats, hamsters, and squirrel monkeys, macaque monkey taste fibers are more narrowly tuned to one of the four basic taste stimuli and more highly developed in sensitivity to various sweet-tasting substances. Also LiCl and NaCl are more effective stimuli for gustatory receptors in macaque monkeys than NH4Cl and KCl. This contrasts with a higher sensitivity to KCl and NH4Cl than to NaCl in chorda tympani fibers of squirrel monkeys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 811758      PMCID: PMC2226225          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.66.6.781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  14 in total

1.  A high-throughput method to measure NaCl and acid taste thresholds in mice.

Authors:  Yutaka Ishiwatari; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Recognizing Taste: Coding Patterns Along the Neural Axis in Mammals.

Authors:  Kathrin Ohla; Ryusuke Yoshida; Stephen D Roper; Patricia M Di Lorenzo; Jonathan D Victor; John D Boughter; Max Fletcher; Donald B Katz; Nirupa Chaudhari
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 3.  TRPs in taste and chemesthesis.

Authors:  Stephen D Roper
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2014

4.  CALHM1 Deletion in Mice Affects Glossopharyngeal Taste Responses, Food Intake, Body Weight, and Life Span.

Authors:  Göran Hellekant; Jared Schmolling; Philippe Marambaud; Teresa A Rose-Hellekant
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 5.  The neurocognitive bases of human multimodal food perception: consciousness.

Authors:  Justus V Verhagen
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2006-10-06

6.  Sweet Thermal Taste: Perceptual Characteristics in Water and Dependence on TAS1R2/TAS1R3.

Authors:  Danielle Nachtigal; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Characteristics of sodium currents in rat geniculate ganglion neurons.

Authors:  Shiro Nakamura; Robert M Bradley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Studies on gustatory responses of amygdaloid neurons in rats.

Authors:  S Azuma; T Yamamoto; Y Kawamura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Cracking taste codes by tapping into sensory neuron impulse traffic.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Robert F Lundy; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Modulation of central gustatory coding by temperature.

Authors:  David M Wilson; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.