Literature DB >> 8116623

Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees.

C I Amos1.   

Abstract

To assess evidence for genetic linkage from pedigrees, I developed a limited variance-components approach. In this method, variability among trait observations from individuals within pedigrees is expressed in terms of fixed effects from covariates and effects due to an unobservable trait-affecting major locus, random polygenic effects, and residual nongenetic variance. The effect attributable to a locus linked to a marker is a function of the additive and dominance components of variance of the locus, the recombination fraction, and the proportion of genes identical by descent at the marker locus for each pair of sibs. For unlinked loci, the polygenic variance component depends only on the relationship between the relative pair. Parameters can be estimated by either maximum-likelihood methods or quasi-likelihood methods. The forms of quasi-likelihood estimators are provided. Hypothesis tests derived from the maximum-likelihood approach are constructed by appeal to asymptotic theory. A simulation study showed that the size of likelihood-ratio tests was appropriate but that the monogenic component of variance was generally underestimated by the likelihood approach.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8116623      PMCID: PMC1918121     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  16 in total

1.  Linkage of body build with sex, eye color, and freckling.

Authors:  A M BRUES
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1950-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Extensions to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method.

Authors:  K Lange; J Westlake; M A Spence
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.670

3.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.

Authors:  E S Lander; D Botstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A more powerful robust sib-pair test of linkage for quantitative traits.

Authors:  C I Amos; R C Elston; A F Wilson; J E Bailey-Wilson
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Robust methods for the detection of genetic linkage for quantitative data from pedigrees.

Authors:  C I Amos; R C Elston
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  On the detection and estimation of linkage between a locus influencing a quantitative character and a marker locus.

Authors:  S D Jayakar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Extended multipoint identity-by-descent analysis of human quantitative traits: efficiency, power, and modeling considerations.

Authors:  N J Schork
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Linkage between quantitative trait and marker loci: methods using all relative pairs.

Authors:  J M Olson; E M Wijsman
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Comparison of two preliminary methods of quantitative linkage analysis.

Authors:  C M Kammerer; J W MacCluer
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 0.444

10.  The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus.

Authors:  J K Haseman; R C Elston
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.805

View more
  221 in total

1.  Quantitative trait loci on chromosomes 3 and 17 influence phenotypes of the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  A H Kissebah; G E Sonnenberg; J Myklebust; M Goldstein; K Broman; R G James; J A Marks; G R Krakower; H J Jacob; J Weber; L Martin; J Blangero; A G Comuzzie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Assessment of parent-of-origin effects in linkage analysis of quantitative traits.

Authors:  R L Hanson; S Kobes; R S Lindsay; W C Knowler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Transformation of sib-pair values for the Haseman-Elston method.

Authors:  D Wang; S Lin; R Cheng; X Gao; F A Wright
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Broad and narrow heritabilities of quantitative traits in a founder population.

Authors:  M Abney; M S McPeek; C Ober
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04-10       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Joint multipoint linkage analysis of multivariate qualitative and quantitative traits. I. Likelihood formulation and simulation results.

Authors:  J T Williams; P Van Eerdewegh; L Almasy; J Blangero
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.

Authors:  D B Allison; M C Neale; R Zannolli; N J Schork; C I Amos; J Blangero
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.

Authors:  P C Sham; S S Cherny; S Purcell; J K Hewitt
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-04-12       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs.

Authors:  W F Forrest; E Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Estimation of variance components of quantitative traits in inbred populations.

Authors:  M Abney; M S McPeek; C Ober
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Mapping quantitative trait loci in complex pedigrees: a two-step variance component approach.

Authors:  A W George; P M Visscher; C S Haley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.