Literature DB >> 8116265

Binocular summation in orientation discrimination depends on stimulus contrast and duration.

M A Bearse1, R D Freeman.   

Abstract

Binocular summation, an improvement in visual performance with binocular viewing compared to monocular viewing, has been studied extensively in detection tasks. Monocular detection thresholds for stationary stimuli are typically about 40% higher than binocular thresholds. Binocular summation in discrimination tasks, however, is often lower and less consistent. A possible explanation for this difference is that saturation of responses limits the extent of binocular summation in discrimination tasks. To investigate this possibility, we used an orientation discrimination task and varied stimulus contrast and exposure duration. Monocular and binocular orientation discrimination thresholds were obtained using one-dimensional difference-of-Gaussian stimuli. For briefly exposed stimuli, binocular summation is greatest at low contrasts (e.g. 66% at 8% contrast) and is reduced systematically at higher contrasts so that monocular and binocular thresholds are approximately equal at contrasts above 15%. Binocular summation for low-contrast stimuli is greatest at a brief exposure duration (50 msec), is reduced at longer durations, and is not significant at durations of 100 msec or longer. Thus, binocular summation in orientation discrimination is greatest for relatively low-energy stimuli. These results are consistent with models of binocular energy summation and the hypothesis that saturation of responses after binocular combination can limit binocular summation in discrimination tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8116265     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90253-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  14 in total

1.  Binocular combination of phase and contrast explained by a gain-control and gain-enhancement model.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Binocular combination of luminance profiles.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Farshad Moradi; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Effects of visual noise on binocular summation in patients with strabismus without amblyopia.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Patrick J Lee; Federico Velez; Joseph Demer
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 1.402

5.  Sublinear binocular integration preserves orientation selectivity in mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhao; Mingna Liu; Jianhua Cang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Binocular interactions underlying the classic optomotor responses of flying flies.

Authors:  Brian J Duistermars; Rachel A Care; Mark A Frye
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Binocular combination of stimulus orientation.

Authors:  O Yehezkel; J Ding; A Sterkin; U Polat; D M Levi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Binocular summation is affected by crowding and tagging.

Authors:  Ziv Siman-Tov; Maria Lev; Uri Polat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Binocular visual performance and summation after correcting higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sabesan; Len Zheleznyak; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Binocular summation of chance decisions.

Authors:  Oren Yehezkel; Anna Sterkin; Dov Sagi; Uri Polat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.